When selecting networking hardware, performance, reliability, and cost are critical factors. The Cisco A9K-MPA-20X10GE and A9K-MOD400-TR are two powerful modules designed for high-performance routing, but they serve different purposes. This comparison evaluates their technical specifications, design, usability, and pricing to help you make an informed decision.
Feature | A9K-MPA-20X10GE | A9K-MOD400-TR |
---|---|---|
Processing Speed | 200 Gbps (20x10G ports) | 400 Gbps (4x100G ports) |
Memory (RAM) | 16 GB DDR4 | 32 GB DDR4 |
Storage Capacity | 128 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD |
Power Consumption | 150W | 250W |
Price Range | 8,000−10,000 | 15,000−18,000 |
The A9K-MOD400-TR offers double the processing speed and memory, making it better for high-bandwidth applications.
The A9K-MPA-20X10GE is more power-efficient and cost-effective for mid-range deployments.
A9K-MPA-20X10GE: Compact design optimized for 10G Ethernet aggregation.
A9K-MOD400-TR: Built for high-density 100G deployments with better heat dissipation.
A9K-MPA-20X10GE: Easier to deploy in existing 10G networks with plug-and-play compatibility.
A9K-MOD400-TR: Requires more configuration but delivers superior throughput for data centers.
The A9K-MPA-20X10GE consumes less power (150W vs. 250W), reducing operational costs.
The A9K-MOD400-TR needs stronger cooling solutions due to higher power draw.
Both support Cisco IOS XR, but the A9K-MOD400-TR is better suited for future 400G upgrades.
The A9K-MPA-20X10GE works best in legacy 10G/40G environments.
Both receive regular Cisco security updates.
The A9K-MOD400-TR has advanced traffic engineering features for large-scale networks.
Choose A9K-MPA-20X10GE if you need a cost-effective, energy-efficient 10G aggregation module.
Opt for A9K-MOD400-TR if your network demands ultra-high-speed 100G/400G connectivity.
Both modules excel in different scenarios, so your choice should align with your network’s current and future needs.