Cisco Catalyst 9200 Series Switch Showdown: C9200-48PB-A vs C9200-24PB-E
When upgrading your campus or branch network, Cisco’s Catalyst 9200 Series offers rugged reliability and modern features. But choosing between the C9200-48PB-A and C9200-24PB-E requires balancing port density, performance, and future-proofing. Here’s a breakdown to guide your decision.
Feature | C9200-48PB-A | C9200-24PB-E |
---|---|---|
Switching Capacity | 176 Gbps | 176 Gbps |
Forwarding Rate | 130.95 Mpps | 130.95 Mpps |
Latency | ~10 μs (for 1G traffic) | ~10 μs (for 1G traffic) |
PoE+ Power Budget | 385W (supports up to 48×802.3at devices) | 385W (supports up to 24×802.3at devices) |
Key Upgrade | Higher port density | Better expansion via dual 10G uplinks |
Why it matters: Both models excel in basic switching tasks, but the C9200-48PB-A wins for dense 1G deployments (e.g., IoT-heavy offices), while the C9200-24PB-E offers flexibility for future 10G upgrades.
C9200-48PB-A:
Edge-centric design: Built for SMBs or branch offices needing maximum PoE+ ports (ideal for IP phones, cameras, and wireless APs).
Basic stacking: Supports up to 8 switches in a stack for unified management.
C9200-24PB-E:
Flexible uplinks: Dual 10G SFP+ ports enable connectivity to core switches or routers.
Enhanced security: Built-in TrustSec and MACsec encryption for sensitive data.
Why it matters: The C9200-24PB-E is better suited for midsize networks requiring scalability and security, while the C9200-48PB-A prioritizes simplicity and PoE+ density.
Form Factor:
Both are compact (1RU) and fanless, making them silent and energy-efficient.
C9200-48PB-A: 48 front-facing RJ-45 ports for easy cable management.
C9200-24PB-E: 24 front ports + 4 combo SFP slots for fiber flexibility.
Durability: MIL-SPEC-810H certified for harsh environments (temperature, vibration).
Why it matters: The C9200-48PB-A is ideal for cluttered wiring closets, while the C9200-24PB-E suits deployments needing fiber connectivity.
Management: Both support Cisco DNA Center, CLI, and REST APIs.
Ease of Use:
C9200-48PB-A: Simplified setup for PoE-heavy environments.
C9200-24PB-E: Advanced features like VXLAN require deeper configuration.
Troubleshooting: LED indicators and Cisco Prime Infrastructure integration aid rapid issue resolution.
Why it matters: The C9200-48PB-A is beginner-friendly, whereas the C9200-24PB-E caters to network pros.
C9200-48PB-A: ~4,500–
5,500 (street price)
C9200-24PB-E: ~6,000–
7,000
ROI: The C9200-48PB-A offers more ports upfront, while the C9200-24PB-E balances cost with long-term scalability.
Why it matters: For tight budgets, the C9200-48PB-A delivers immediate value; enterprises may prefer the C9200-24PB-E’s upgrade path.
Idle Power: ~35W (both models)
Under Load: ~150W (C9200-48PB-A) vs. ~180W (C9200-24PB-E)
Efficiency: Both meet ENERGY STAR standards, but the C9200-48PB-A edges out slightly lower power draw.
Why it matters: Greener deployments or cost-sensitive environments may lean toward the C9200-48PB-A.
C9200-48PB-A:
Works with Cisco ISR/ASR routers, UCS servers, and third-party PoE devices.
Limited to 48 ports (no expansion slots).
C9200-24PB-E:
Supports 10G SFP+ modules for fiber uplinks.
Stacking with other Catalyst 9200/9300 switches.
Why it matters: The C9200-24PB-E future-proofs your network, while the C9200-48PB-A is plug-and-play.
Common Ground: Both run Cisco IOS XE Software, supporting features like:
SD-WAN (via Viptela integration)
Network segmentation (TrustSec)
Cloud-based management (Meraki integration)
Differences:
C9200-24PB-E: Enables advanced overlays (VXLAN/EVPN) with additional licensing.
Why it matters: The C9200-24PB-E is better for organizations adopting cloud-native architectures.
Choose the C9200-48PB-A if:
You need a cost-effective, PoE-dense switch for SMBs or branch offices with no immediate plans for 10G upgrades.
Choose the C9200-24PB-E if:
Scalability, fiber connectivity, and advanced features (VXLAN, 10G uplinks) are critical for your growing network.
Need help deciding? Share your network goals, and we’ll tailor a solution!