Cisco Catalyst 9200 Series Switch Showdown: C9200-48PB-E vs C9200L-48PXG-2Y
When upgrading your campus or branch network, selecting the right Catalyst 9200 switch can future-proof your infrastructure while balancing cost and performance. Here’s a breakdown of two popular models—C9200-48PB-E and C9200L-48PXG-2Y—to help you decide which fits your needs.
C9200-48PB-E:
Switching Capacity: 176 Gbps
Forwarding Rate: 130.95 Mpps
RAM: 4 GB
Storage: 16 GB Flash
Latency: ~3 μs (typical)
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Switching Capacity: 336 Gbps
Forwarding Rate: 252 Mpps
RAM: 8 GB
Storage: 32 GB Flash
Latency: ~1.5 μs (optimized for low-latency apps)
Why it matters: The C9200L doubles the switching capacity and memory, making it ideal for demanding environments like IoT or unified communications.
C9200-48PB-E:
Supports VLANs, STP, and basic QoS.
Legacy PoE+ (up to 30 W per port).
Limited IPv6 and multicast routing.
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Advanced features like VXLAN, EVPN, and Segment Routing.
PoE++ (90 W per port) for powering AR/VR headsets or high-density IoT.
Native IPv6 and multicast optimization for campus-wide SDN deployments.
Why it matters: The C9200L is built for modern, programmable networks, while the C9200-48PB-E suits simpler setups.
C9200-48PB-E:
Traditional 1RU rack-mount design.
Fixed 48x 1G/10G SFP+ ports + 4x 40G QSFP+ uplinks.
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Compact 1RU form factor with 48x 25G SFP28 ports (breakout to 4x 100G QSFP28).
Fanless operation for quieter data centers.
Why it matters: The C9200L’s modular ports future-proof your network for 25G/100G upgrades.
C9200-48PB-E:
CLI-driven management; limited automation.
Older web interface with basic analytics.
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Tight integration with Cisco DNA Center for intent-based networking.
Built-in telemetry and NetFlow for real-time monitoring.
Why it matters: The C9200L streamlines operations through automation and AI-driven insights.
C9200-48PB-E:
Lower upfront cost (~5,000–
7,000).
Higher long-term costs due to inefficient power consumption (~80W).
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Premium price (~10,000–
12,000).
Energy efficiency (~45W) reduces operational expenses over time.
ROI Tip: The C9200L pays off in 2–3 years via lower power bills and scalability.
C9200-48PB-E:
Supports PoE+ but lacks battery backup redundancy.
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Includes redundant DC power supplies and supports inline power for mission-critical devices.
Why it matters: The C9200L ensures uptime for VoIP phones and security cameras during outages.
C9200-48PB-E:
Works with older Cisco Nexus modules but lacks modern ASIC flexibility.
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Modular design allows adding 400G uplinks via expansion modules.
Backward-compatible with Cisco ACI and Meraki clouds.
Why it matters: The C9200L adapts to evolving network demands without replacement.
C9200-48PB-E:
Runs older IOS-XE versions (e.g., 16.x), nearing end-of-life.
C9200L-48PXG-2Y:
Certified for IOS-XE 17.x+, ensuring long-term security patches and feature updates.
Security Alert: The C9200L receives extended lifecycle support, critical for compliance.
Cisco Catalyst 9200 Series Switch Comparison: C9200-48PB-E vs. C9200L-48PXG-2Y
When upgrading your campus or branch network, selecting the right Catalyst 9200 switch balances cost, performance, and future-readiness. Here’s a detailed comparison:
C9200-48PB-E: 176 Gbps switching capacity, 130 Mpps forwarding rate.
C9200L-48PXG-2Y: 336 Gbps capacity, 252 Mpps rate.
C9200L adds VXLAN, EVPN, and IPv6 multicast, ideal for SDN.
C9200-48PB-E focuses on basic Layer 2/3 functionality.
C9200L’s fanless 25G ports save space and power compared to C9200-48PB-E’s 1G/10G design.
C9200L’s energy efficiency and scalability reduce long-term expenses despite higher upfront costs.
Key Takeaway: The C9200L is built for modern, AI-driven networks, while the C9200-48PB-E suits budget-constrained legacy environments.
Choose the C9200-48PB-E if:
You need a low-cost, simple switch for basic office networks.
Your existing infrastructure relies on older Cisco protocols.
Opt for the C9200L-48PXG-2Y if:
You’re deploying IoT, AI/ML, or 5G edge applications.
Scalability and long-term support are priorities.