Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-44%
Cisco Nexus N9K-C9232C 32x 100G QSFP28 Switch 2x AC PSU R-F Airflow
$2850 $1600
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900

Cisco ASR1006-X vs DS-C9513 Enterprise vs Hyperscale Router Performance Evaluation
Jun 27 , 2025 74

Cisco ASR1006-X vs DS-C9513: Enterprise vs Hyperscale Router Performance Evaluation


ASR1006-X vs DS-C9513


Network architects must carefully evaluate the Cisco ASR1006-X (enterprise aggregation router) and DS-C9513 (hyperscale core router) to understand their distinct capabilities. This technical comparison examines their specifications, operational characteristics, and ideal deployment scenarios.

Technical Specifications Comparison

FeatureCisco ASR1006-XCisco DS-C9513
Device ClassEnterprise Aggregation RouterHyperscale Core Router
Chassis Type6-slot modular13-slot modular
Processor12-core X8664-core Silicon One
System Memory96 GB DDR41 TB DDR4
Storage360 GB SSD8 TB NVMe SSD
Forwarding Capacity80 Gbps3.6 Tbps
Max Interfaces48x 1/10/40G512x 100/400G
Power SupplyDual 1500W ACSix 8000W DC
Power Consumption450W (typical)6.5 kW (typical)
Latency15 μs<1 μs

The DS-C9513 delivers 45x greater performance than the ASR1006-X, reflecting its hyperscale data center design.

Functional Capabilities Analysis

1. Core Routing Features

Shared Capabilities:

  • BGP/OSPF/IS-IS routing

  • Basic QoS policies

  • ACL filtering

  • NetFlow monitoring

DS-C9513 Exclusive Features:

  • Segment routing (SRv6)

  • Nanosecond latency

  • 800G interfaces

  • Non-blocking architecture

  • Deep packet buffers (256MB)

2. Deployment Scenarios

  • ASR1006-X excels in:

    • Enterprise WAN aggregation

    • Regional office connectivity

    • Medium-scale VPN services

  • DS-C9513 optimized for:

    • Cloud provider cores

    • AI/ML workload fabrics

    • Hyperscale peering

Physical Design Comparison

Chassis Architecture:

  • ASR1006-X:

    • 5RU modular chassis

    • Front-access design

    • Field-replaceable components

    • 55 lbs empty weight

    • Office-grade cooling

  • DS-C9513:

    • 21RU modular chassis

    • Front/rear service access

    • Hot-swappable fabric cards

    • 450 lbs empty weight

    • Data center cooling system

Environmental Specifications:

  • Operating temperature:

    • ASR1006-X: 0°C to 40°C

    • DS-C9513: 5°C to 27°C

  • Acoustic noise:

    • ASR1006-X: 65 dBA

    • DS-C9513: 85 dBA

  • Power options:

    • ASR1006-X: AC only

    • DS-C9513: DC/HVDC only

User Experience Evaluation

Management Interfaces:
Both support:

  • CLI access

  • SNMP monitoring

  • Basic automation

DS-C9513 Advanced Features:

  • Model-driven telemetry

  • gRPC/NETCONF interfaces

  • AI-driven optimization

  • Kubernetes networking

Operational Differences:

  • ASR1006-X designed for:

    • IT generalists

    • Standard office environments

    • Remote management

  • DS-C9513 requires:

    • Data center specialists

    • High-voltage power training

    • Specialized cooling knowledge

Pricing & Total Cost Analysis

Acquisition Costs:

  • ASR1006-X: 35,00050,000

  • DS-C9513: 850,0001.2M

Operational Expenditures:

  • Power consumption difference: ~$7,800/year

  • Rack space requirements:

    • DS-C9513 needs 4x more space

  • Support contracts:

    • DS-C9513 requires 24/7 premium SLA

Five-Year TCO Considerations:

  • DS-C9513 justified for:

    • Hyperscale applications

    • Cloud infrastructure

    • Future-proof investments

  • ASR1006-X economical for:

    • Enterprise networks

    • Regional deployments

    • Budget-conscious projects

Power Efficiency Metrics

Energy Usage:

  • ASR1006-X:

    • Idle: 300W

    • Peak: 600W

  • DS-C9513:

    • Idle: 4.2 kW

    • Peak: 8.1 kW

Efficiency Comparison:

  • Performance per watt:

    • ASR1006-X: 133 Mbps/W

    • DS-C9513: 553 Mbps/W

Compatibility & Ecosystem

Third-Party Integration:
Both support:

  • Basic SNMP monitoring

  • Syslog reporting

  • Limited automation

DS-C9513 Advantages:

  • Cloud orchestration

  • CI/CD pipeline integration

  • OpenConfig support

  • AI workload optimization

Software Support & Roadmap

Current Software Features:

  • ASR1006-X: IOS-XE 17.x

  • DS-C9513: IOS-XR 7.x

  • Different feature sets

Future Development:

  • DS-C9513 prioritized for:

    • 1.6T interfaces

    • AI networking

    • Cloud-native routing

  • ASR1006-X focused on:

    • Security enhancements

    • SD-WAN features

    • Basic maintenance

Final Recommendation

Choose ASR1006-X When:
✔ Enterprise network aggregation
✔ Budget under $60,000
✔ Standard office environment
✔ IT generalist management

Select DS-C9513 When:
✔ Hyperscale data center core
✔ Need terabit routing
✔ AI/ML workload support
✔ Specialized DC infrastructure

Implementation Strategy:
Deploy DS-C9513 in cloud cores and ASR1006-X at enterprise aggregation points to create a hierarchical network architecture.

Key Differentiators:

  1. Performance: 3.6T vs 80G forwarding

  2. Scale: 512x vs 48x interfaces

  3. Environment: DC vs office deployment

  4. Operations: Specialized vs standard

Technical Note: These routers serve fundamentally different purposes - the DS-C9513 for cloud providers and the ASR1006-X for enterprise networks. The performance gap reflects their distinct design philosophies and target markets.


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top