Network architects must carefully evaluate the Cisco ASR1006-X (enterprise aggregation router) and DS-C9513 (hyperscale core router) to understand their distinct capabilities. This technical comparison examines their specifications, operational characteristics, and ideal deployment scenarios.
Feature | Cisco ASR1006-X | Cisco DS-C9513 |
---|---|---|
Device Class | Enterprise Aggregation Router | Hyperscale Core Router |
Chassis Type | 6-slot modular | 13-slot modular |
Processor | 12-core X86 | 64-core Silicon One |
System Memory | 96 GB DDR4 | 1 TB DDR4 |
Storage | 360 GB SSD | 8 TB NVMe SSD |
Forwarding Capacity | 80 Gbps | 3.6 Tbps |
Max Interfaces | 48x 1/10/40G | 512x 100/400G |
Power Supply | Dual 1500W AC | Six 8000W DC |
Power Consumption | 450W (typical) | 6.5 kW (typical) |
Latency | 15 μs | <1 μs |
The DS-C9513 delivers 45x greater performance than the ASR1006-X, reflecting its hyperscale data center design.
Shared Capabilities:
BGP/OSPF/IS-IS routing
Basic QoS policies
ACL filtering
NetFlow monitoring
DS-C9513 Exclusive Features:
Segment routing (SRv6)
Nanosecond latency
800G interfaces
Non-blocking architecture
Deep packet buffers (256MB)
ASR1006-X excels in:
Enterprise WAN aggregation
Regional office connectivity
Medium-scale VPN services
DS-C9513 optimized for:
Cloud provider cores
AI/ML workload fabrics
Hyperscale peering
Chassis Architecture:
ASR1006-X:
5RU modular chassis
Front-access design
Field-replaceable components
55 lbs empty weight
Office-grade cooling
DS-C9513:
21RU modular chassis
Front/rear service access
Hot-swappable fabric cards
450 lbs empty weight
Data center cooling system
Environmental Specifications:
Operating temperature:
ASR1006-X: 0°C to 40°C
DS-C9513: 5°C to 27°C
Acoustic noise:
ASR1006-X: 65 dBA
DS-C9513: 85 dBA
Power options:
ASR1006-X: AC only
DS-C9513: DC/HVDC only
Management Interfaces:
Both support:
CLI access
SNMP monitoring
Basic automation
DS-C9513 Advanced Features:
Model-driven telemetry
gRPC/NETCONF interfaces
AI-driven optimization
Kubernetes networking
Operational Differences:
ASR1006-X designed for:
IT generalists
Standard office environments
Remote management
DS-C9513 requires:
Data center specialists
High-voltage power training
Specialized cooling knowledge
Acquisition Costs:
ASR1006-X: 35,000−50,000
DS-C9513: 850,000−1.2M
Operational Expenditures:
Power consumption difference: ~$7,800/year
Rack space requirements:
DS-C9513 needs 4x more space
Support contracts:
DS-C9513 requires 24/7 premium SLA
Five-Year TCO Considerations:
DS-C9513 justified for:
Hyperscale applications
Cloud infrastructure
Future-proof investments
ASR1006-X economical for:
Enterprise networks
Regional deployments
Budget-conscious projects
Energy Usage:
ASR1006-X:
Idle: 300W
Peak: 600W
DS-C9513:
Idle: 4.2 kW
Peak: 8.1 kW
Efficiency Comparison:
Performance per watt:
ASR1006-X: 133 Mbps/W
DS-C9513: 553 Mbps/W
Third-Party Integration:
Both support:
Basic SNMP monitoring
Syslog reporting
Limited automation
DS-C9513 Advantages:
Cloud orchestration
CI/CD pipeline integration
OpenConfig support
AI workload optimization
Current Software Features:
ASR1006-X: IOS-XE 17.x
DS-C9513: IOS-XR 7.x
Different feature sets
Future Development:
DS-C9513 prioritized for:
1.6T interfaces
AI networking
Cloud-native routing
ASR1006-X focused on:
Security enhancements
SD-WAN features
Basic maintenance
Choose ASR1006-X When:
✔ Enterprise network aggregation
✔ Budget under $60,000
✔ Standard office environment
✔ IT generalist management
Select DS-C9513 When:
✔ Hyperscale data center core
✔ Need terabit routing
✔ AI/ML workload support
✔ Specialized DC infrastructure
Implementation Strategy:
Deploy DS-C9513 in cloud cores and ASR1006-X at enterprise aggregation points to create a hierarchical network architecture.
Key Differentiators:
Performance: 3.6T vs 80G forwarding
Scale: 512x vs 48x interfaces
Environment: DC vs office deployment
Operations: Specialized vs standard
Technical Note: These routers serve fundamentally different purposes - the DS-C9513 for cloud providers and the ASR1006-X for enterprise networks. The performance gap reflects their distinct design philosophies and target markets.