Cisco C1117-4PLTELAWZ vs C1111-4P: The Ruggedized LTE Router for Demanding Environments

When comparing Cisco's C1117-4PLTELAWZ (a ruggedized, LTE-enhanced model) with the standard C1111-4P, the differences go beyond basic specifications. Designed for harsh environments and mission-critical connectivity, the C1117-4PLTELAWZ offers unique advantages that justify its premium pricing. Below, we break down the key distinctions to help network administrators make the right choice.

Technical Specifications Comparison

The C1117-4PLTELAWZ is built for extreme conditions, offering better processing power, ruggedized ports, and LTE failover—features absent in the standard C1111-4P.

Functional Differences

1. LTE Connectivity & Failover

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ:

• Integrated LTE-Advanced Pro modem (up to 600 Mbps download)

• Multi-carrier support (global variants available)

• Automatic WAN failover (critical for remote sites)

• C1111-4P:

• No built-in cellular connectivity

• Requires external USB modem for LTE backup

2. Security & Compliance

Both models include:
✔ IPsec VPN, Firewall, and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)
✔ Encrypted traffic inspection

C1117-4PLTELAWZ adds:

• FIPS 140-2 compliance (for government/military use)

• Hardware-accelerated encryption

• Secure boot & tamper-proofing

Design & Durability

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ:

• Heavy-duty metal casing (resistant to shock/vibration)

• Sealed connectors (prevents dust/moisture ingress)

• Corrosion-resistant (ideal for industrial sites)

• C1111-4P:

• Standard office-grade enclosure

• No special protection against harsh conditions

Deployment Scenarios:

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ: Oil rigs, military bases, outdoor telecom cabinets

• C1111-4P: Office environments, retail stores, small branches

User Experience & Management

Setup & Configuration

• Both use Cisco’s web interface & CLI

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ includes ruggedized console port (for field deployments)

Performance in Harsh Conditions

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ:

• No performance drop in extreme temps

• Stable LTE even in low-signal areas

• C1111-4P:

• Not designed for challenging environments

• May overheat in high-temperature settings

Price & Value Comparison

Justifying the Premium:

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ is 2.5x more expensive but offers:

• LTE redundancy (prevents costly downtime)

• Military-grade durability (longer lifespan in harsh conditions)

• Higher performance under stress

Power Efficiency & Battery Considerations

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ:

• Higher power draw (25W vs 15W) due to ruggedized components

• Supports DC power input (12-48V) for vehicles/solar setups

• C1111-4P:

• More energy-efficient (better for offices)

• Standard AC power only

Battery Backup Impact:

• The C1117-4PLTELAWZ may reduce UPS runtime by 20-30% but is built for scenarios where power fluctuations are common.

Compatibility & Expansion

Hardware Compatibility

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ:

• Works with industrial-grade switches & antennas

• Optional GPS module for tracking mobile deployments

• C1111-4P:

• Limited to standard networking peripherals

Software & Cloud Integration

Both support:
✔ Cisco SD-WAN
✔ Cisco DNA Center
✔ AWS/Azure cloud management

C1117-4PLTELAWZ adds:

• IoT edge computing capabilities

• Longer firmware support cycle

Software Support & Longevity

• Security Updates:

• C1117-4PLTELAWZ receives extended support (7+ years)

• C1111-4P gets standard updates (5 years)

• Feature Roadmap:

• Rugged model prioritized for industrial IoT features

• Standard model focuses on basic office networking

Final Recommendation

Choose C1111-4P if:

You need a cost-effective office router
Your environment is climate-controlled
LTE failover isn’t a priority

Choose C1117-4PLTELAWZ if:

You operate in extreme conditions (heat, dust, moisture)
Network uptime is critical (LTE backup required)
You need military/industrial-grade durability

Bottom Line:

The C1117-4PLTELAWZ is a specialized tool for demanding deployments, while the C1111-4P is a reliable but basic office router. If your operations involve harsh environments or mission-critical connectivity, the rugged model is worth the investment.

Need help deciding? Consider your deployment environment, uptime requirements, and budget constraints before choosing.