When selecting between F5 Networks' application delivery controllers, the BIG-IP i7820-DF (high-performance model) and BIG-IP i4600 (mid-range solution) offer distinct capabilities for different network environments. This detailed comparison examines their technical specifications, operational performance, and ideal deployment scenarios to assist network architects in making informed decisions.
Feature | F5 BIG-IP i7820-DF | F5 BIG-IP i4600 |
---|---|---|
Processor | 16-core 3.2 GHz | 8-core 2.4 GHz |
System Memory | 96 GB DDR4 | 32 GB DDR4 |
Storage | 1.2 TB SSD | 480 GB SSD |
Throughput Capacity | 60 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
SSL/TLS Performance | 30 Gbps | 10 Gbps |
Maximum Connections | 3 million | 1 million |
Power Consumption | 400W (typical) | 220W (typical) |
Network Interfaces | 16x 10/25/40G | 8x 1/10G |
The i7820-DF delivers 3x greater performance in throughput and connection handling compared to the i4600, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise deployments.
Both models support:
Layer 4-7 load balancing
SSL/TLS offloading
Application health monitoring
Web application firewall
DNS load balancing
i7820-DF Advantages:
Higher connection capacity (3M vs 1M)
Advanced traffic shaping
Better SSL inspection performance
Enhanced DDoS protection
i4600 Strengths:
More power-efficient
Compact 1RU form factor
Cost-effective for mid-range needs
i7820-DF excels in:
High-volume traffic inspection
Advanced rate shaping
Detailed performance analytics
i4600 optimized for:
Standard security policies
Moderate traffic loads
Basic WAF configurations
Chassis Architecture:
i7820-DF:
2RU enterprise design
Redundant power supplies
High-density port configuration
Data center optimized
i4600:
1RU compact form factor
Single power supply
Space-efficient design
Environmental Specifications:
Operating temperature:
Both: 0°C to 40°C
Physical dimensions:
i7820-DF: 2RU, 24" deep
i4600: 1RU, 17.5" deep
Weight:
i7820-DF: 35 lbs
i4600: 20 lbs
Administration & Management:
Both utilize:
F5 TMOS operating system
Web-based GUI
tmsh CLI
REST API support
Operational Differences:
i7820-DF better for:
Complex traffic policies
High-availability setups
Multi-site deployments
i4600 ideal for:
Simpler configurations
Single-site deployments
Lower administrative overhead
Acquisition Costs:
i7820-DF: 85,000−100,000
i4600: 35,000−45,000
Operational Expenditures:
Power consumption difference: ~$200/year
Rack space requirements:
i7820-DF needs 2x more space
Support contracts:
Similar licensing models
Five-Year TCO Considerations:
i7820-DF justified for:
High-traffic websites
Financial services
Cloud-scale ADC needs
i4600 economical for:
Medium business applications
Branch office deployments
Cost-sensitive projects
Energy Usage:
i7820-DF: 400W (peak)
i4600: 220W (peak)
Efficiency Comparison:
Performance per watt:
i7820-DF: 150 Mbps/W
i4600: 90 Mbps/W
Idle power draw:
i7820-DF: 250W
i4600: 120W
Third-Party Integration:
Both support:
VMware, KVM, Hyper-V
Cloud platforms
Automation tools
i7820-DF Advantages:
More high-speed ports
Better scalability
Advanced SDN support
Current Versions:
Both run TMOS 16.x+
Support iRules customization
Future Development:
i7820-DF prioritized for:
Cloud ADC features
Enhanced analytics
i4600 receives:
Core updates
Security patches
Choose i7820-DF When:
✔ Handling 3M+ connections
✔ Need 60G+ throughput
✔ Running critical applications
✔ Planning future growth
Select i4600 When:
✔ Managing medium traffic
✔ Require cost efficiency
✔ Deploying in space-limited areas
✔ Running standard workloads
Both deliver F5's proven ADC technology, with the i7820-DF offering superior performance for enterprise-scale deployments and the i4600 providing excellent value for mid-range needs.
Implementation Strategy:
For organizations with mixed requirements, consider deploying i7820-DF at core locations and i4600 units at branch offices or DR sites to balance performance and cost-effectiveness.