
When selecting between F5 Networks' application delivery controllers, the BIG-IP i7820-DF (high-performance model) and BIG-IP i4600 (mid-range solution) offer distinct capabilities for different network environments. This detailed comparison examines their technical specifications, operational performance, and ideal deployment scenarios to assist network architects in making informed decisions.
| Feature | F5 BIG-IP i7820-DF | F5 BIG-IP i4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | 16-core 3.2 GHz | 8-core 2.4 GHz |
| System Memory | 96 GB DDR4 | 32 GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 1.2 TB SSD | 480 GB SSD |
| Throughput Capacity | 60 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
| SSL/TLS Performance | 30 Gbps | 10 Gbps |
| Maximum Connections | 3 million | 1 million |
| Power Consumption | 400W (typical) | 220W (typical) |
| Network Interfaces | 16x 10/25/40G | 8x 1/10G |
The i7820-DF delivers 3x greater performance in throughput and connection handling compared to the i4600, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise deployments.
Both models support:
Layer 4-7 load balancing
SSL/TLS offloading
Application health monitoring
Web application firewall
DNS load balancing
i7820-DF Advantages:
Higher connection capacity (3M vs 1M)
Advanced traffic shaping
Better SSL inspection performance
Enhanced DDoS protection
i4600 Strengths:
More power-efficient
Compact 1RU form factor
Cost-effective for mid-range needs
i7820-DF excels in:
High-volume traffic inspection
Advanced rate shaping
Detailed performance analytics
i4600 optimized for:
Standard security policies
Moderate traffic loads
Basic WAF configurations
Chassis Architecture:
i7820-DF:
2RU enterprise design
Redundant power supplies
High-density port configuration
Data center optimized
i4600:
1RU compact form factor
Single power supply
Space-efficient design
Environmental Specifications:
Operating temperature:
Both: 0°C to 40°C
Physical dimensions:
i7820-DF: 2RU, 24" deep
i4600: 1RU, 17.5" deep
Weight:
i7820-DF: 35 lbs
i4600: 20 lbs
Administration & Management:
Both utilize:
F5 TMOS operating system
Web-based GUI
tmsh CLI
REST API support
Operational Differences:
i7820-DF better for:
Complex traffic policies
High-availability setups
Multi-site deployments
i4600 ideal for:
Simpler configurations
Single-site deployments
Lower administrative overhead
Acquisition Costs:
i7820-DF: 85,000−100,000
i4600: 35,000−45,000
Operational Expenditures:
Power consumption difference: ~$200/year
Rack space requirements:
i7820-DF needs 2x more space
Support contracts:
Similar licensing models
Five-Year TCO Considerations:
i7820-DF justified for:
High-traffic websites
Financial services
Cloud-scale ADC needs
i4600 economical for:
Medium business applications
Branch office deployments
Cost-sensitive projects
Energy Usage:
i7820-DF: 400W (peak)
i4600: 220W (peak)
Efficiency Comparison:
Performance per watt:
i7820-DF: 150 Mbps/W
i4600: 90 Mbps/W
Idle power draw:
i7820-DF: 250W
i4600: 120W
Third-Party Integration:
Both support:
VMware, KVM, Hyper-V
Cloud platforms
Automation tools
i7820-DF Advantages:
More high-speed ports
Better scalability
Advanced SDN support
Current Versions:
Both run TMOS 16.x+
Support iRules customization
Future Development:
i7820-DF prioritized for:
Cloud ADC features
Enhanced analytics
i4600 receives:
Core updates
Security patches
Choose i7820-DF When:
✔ Handling 3M+ connections
✔ Need 60G+ throughput
✔ Running critical applications
✔ Planning future growth
Select i4600 When:
✔ Managing medium traffic
✔ Require cost efficiency
✔ Deploying in space-limited areas
✔ Running standard workloads
Both deliver F5's proven ADC technology, with the i7820-DF offering superior performance for enterprise-scale deployments and the i4600 providing excellent value for mid-range needs.
Implementation Strategy:
For organizations with mixed requirements, consider deploying i7820-DF at core locations and i4600 units at branch offices or DR sites to balance performance and cost-effectiveness.