Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900
-31%
Cisco MDS 9200 Series Switch DS-C9250I-K9
$1600 $1100

F5 BIG-IP LTM 10000S vs i4600: Enterprise-Class vs Mid-Range ADC Performance Breakdown
Jun 25 , 2025 3

F5 BIG-IP LTM 10000S vs i4600: Enterprise-Class vs Mid-Range ADC Performance Breakdown


F5-BIG-LTM-10000S vs F5-BIG-BT-I4600


When evaluating application delivery controllers from F5 Networks, the BIG-IP LTM 10000S (flagship enterprise model) and BIG-IP i4600 (mid-range solution) serve fundamentally different operational requirements. This comprehensive analysis compares their technical specifications, functional capabilities, and deployment considerations to assist network architects in selecting the optimal solution.

Technical Specifications Comparison

FeatureF5 BIG-IP LTM 10000SF5 BIG-IP i4600
Processor24-core 3.4 GHz8-core 2.4 GHz
System Memory128 GB DDR432 GB DDR4
Storage1.6 TB SSD480 GB SSD
Throughput Capacity80 Gbps20 Gbps
SSL/TLS Performance40 Gbps10 Gbps
Maximum Connections5 million1 million
Power Consumption500W (typical)220W (typical)
Network Interfaces32x 10/25/40G8x 1/10G

The LTM 10000S delivers 4-5x greater performance than the i4600, establishing itself as F5's premier ADC solution for large-scale enterprise deployments.

Functional Capabilities Analysis

1. Core ADC Features

Both models provide:

  • Layer 4-7 load balancing

  • SSL/TLS acceleration

  • Application health monitoring

  • Web application firewall

  • DNS load balancing

LTM 10000S Advantages:

  • 5x greater connection capacity

  • Hardware-accelerated SSL

  • Advanced traffic engineering

  • Enterprise-grade DDoS protection

i4600 Strengths:

  • More power-efficient

  • Compact 1RU footprint

  • Cost-effective for medium workloads

2. Security & Traffic Management

  • LTM 10000S excels in:

    • High-volume traffic inspection

    • Advanced rate shaping

    • Granular performance analytics

    • Behavioral threat detection

  • i4600 optimized for:

    • Standard security policies

    • Moderate traffic loads

    • Basic WAF configurations

Physical Design Comparison

Chassis Architecture:

  • LTM 10000S:

    • 3RU enterprise chassis

    • N+1 power redundancy

    • Front/rear service access

    • Carrier-grade components

  • i4600:

    • 1RU compact design

    • Single power supply

    • Front-accessible ports

    • Office-friendly footprint

Environmental Specifications:

  • Operating temperature:

    • Both: 0°C to 40°C

  • Physical dimensions:

    • LTM 10000S: 3RU, 28" deep

    • i4600: 1RU, 17.5" deep

  • Weight:

    • LTM 10000S: 45 lbs

    • i4600: 20 lbs

User Experience Evaluation

Administration & Management:
Both utilize:

  • F5 TMOS operating system

  • Web-based GUI

  • tmsh CLI

  • REST API support

Operational Differences:

  • LTM 10000S better for:

    • Complex multi-site deployments

    • High-availability configurations

    • Enterprise traffic management

  • i4600 ideal for:

    • Simplified administration

    • Single-site deployments

    • Lower operational overhead

Pricing & Total Cost Analysis

Acquisition Costs:

  • LTM 10000S: 120,000150,000

  • i4600: 35,00045,000

Operational Expenditures:

  • Power consumption difference: ~$300/year

  • Rack space requirements:

    • LTM 10000S needs 3x more space

  • Support contracts:

    • Both require premium licensing

Five-Year TCO Considerations:

  • LTM 10000S justified for:

    • Mission-critical applications

    • Global enterprise deployments

    • High-security environments

  • i4600 economical for:

    • Medium business needs

    • Branch office deployments

    • Budget-conscious projects

Power Efficiency Metrics

Energy Usage:

  • LTM 10000S: 500W (peak)

  • i4600: 220W (peak)

Efficiency Comparison:

  • Performance per watt:

    • LTM 10000S: 160 Mbps/W

    • i4600: 90 Mbps/W

  • Idle power draw:

    • LTM 10000S: 300W

    • i4600: 120W

Compatibility & Expansion

Third-Party Integration:
Both support:

  • VMware, KVM, Hyper-V

  • Cloud platforms

  • Automation tools

LTM 10000S Advantages:

  • 40G/100G network readiness

  • Advanced SDN integration

  • Carrier-grade interoperability

Software Support & Roadmap

Current Versions:

  • Both run TMOS 16.x+

  • Support iRules customization

Future Development:

  • LTM 10000S prioritized for:

    • Cloud-scale ADC features

    • AI-driven traffic optimization

    • Quantum-safe cryptography

  • i4600 receives:

    • Core security updates

    • Basic feature enhancements

Final Recommendation

Choose LTM 10000S When:
✔ Operating global enterprise networks
✔ Requiring 80G+ throughput capacity
✔ Managing 5M+ concurrent connections
✔ Needing carrier-grade reliability

Select i4600 When:
✔ Deploying in medium-sized data centers
✔ Handling up to 20Gbps traffic
✔ Running standard application workloads
✔ Working with constrained budgets

Implementation Strategy:
For organizations with diverse needs, consider deploying the LTM 10000S at core locations and i4600 units at regional offices to optimize both performance and cost-efficiency across the network infrastructure.

Key Differentiators:

  1. Performance: LTM 10000S handles 5x more connections

  2. Scalability: 10000S supports future 100G networks

  3. Security: Flagship model offers advanced threat protection

  4. Cost: i4600 provides better value for mid-range needs

The choice ultimately depends on current workload requirements and anticipated growth, with the LTM 10000S representing F5's most powerful ADC solution and the i4600 offering capable mid-range performance at a more accessible price point.


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top