When selecting an application delivery controller (ADC), choosing between the F5 BIG-IP LTM i5800 (high-end model) and the F5 BIG-IP i4600 (mid-range model) depends on performance needs, scalability, and budget. This comparison breaks down their technical specifications, functional differences, and ideal use cases to help network administrators make the right decision.
Feature | F5 BIG-IP LTM i5800 | F5 BIG-IP i4600 |
---|---|---|
Processor | 16-core 3.0 GHz | 8-core 2.4 GHz |
System Memory | 64 GB DDR4 | 32 GB DDR4 |
Storage | 960 GB SSD | 480 GB SSD |
Throughput Capacity | 40 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
SSL/TLS Performance | 20 Gbps | 10 Gbps |
Maximum Connections | 2 million | 1 million |
Power Consumption | 350W (typical) | 220W (typical) |
Network Interfaces | 16x 10/25G SFP28 | 8x 1/10G SFP+ |
The i5800 offers double the performance in processing power, memory, and throughput, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise deployments, while the i4600 provides a cost-effective solution for medium-sized businesses.
Both models support:
Layer 4-7 load balancing
SSL/TLS offloading
Application health monitoring
Web application firewall (WAF)
DNS load balancing
i5800 Advantages:
Higher connection handling (2M vs 1M)
Better SSL inspection performance
Advanced traffic shaping for large-scale environments
i4600 Strengths:
Sufficient for most mid-sized businesses
Lower power consumption
More budget-friendly
i5800 excels in:
High-volume DDoS protection
Advanced rate shaping
Granular traffic analytics
i4600 is optimized for:
Standard security policies
Moderate traffic loads
Basic WAF configurations
Chassis & Build:
i5800:
2RU form factor
Redundant power supplies (optional)
High-density port configuration
i4600:
1RU compact design
Single power supply
Space-efficient for smaller data centers
Environmental Specs:
Operating temperature: 0°C to 40°C (both)
Weight:
i5800: 30 lbs
i4600: 20 lbs
Noise levels:
i5800: 65 dB (higher due to cooling needs)
i4600: 55 dB (quieter operation)
Administration:
Both use F5 TMOS (Traffic Management Operating System)
Web-based GUI (F5 Configuration Utility)
CLI access via tmsh (TMOS Shell)
REST API for automation
Operational Differences:
i5800 is better for:
Large enterprises with complex policies
High-availability setups
Multi-tenant environments
i4600 is ideal for:
Simpler deployments
Single-site load balancing
Lower administrative overhead
Initial Purchase Cost:
i5800: 65,000–80,000
i4600: 35,000–45,000
5-Year TCO Considerations:
i5800 justified for:
High-traffic websites
Financial services with strict compliance
Cloud-scale ADC needs
i4600 more economical for:
Medium business applications
Branch office deployments
Cost-sensitive projects
Energy Usage:
i5800: 350W (peak)
i4600: 220W (peak)
Efficiency Metrics:
Performance per watt:
i5800: 114 Mbps/W
i4600: 90 Mbps/W
Idle power draw:
i5800: 180W
i4600: 120W
Third-Party Integration:
Both support:
VMware, KVM, Hyper-V
AWS, Azure, GCP
Ansible, Terraform automation
i5800 Advantages:
More 25G/40G ports for high-speed networks
Better scalability for future upgrades
Supports advanced SDN integrations
i4600 Limitations:
Fewer high-speed ports
Limited expansion slots
Current Software Versions:
Both run TMOS 16.x+
Support for iRules, iApps, iControl REST API
Maintenance & Updates:
i5800 receives:
Priority firmware updates
Extended security patches
i4600 has:
Standard support lifecycle
Regular vulnerability fixes
Future-Proofing:
i5800 will likely get:
AI-driven traffic optimization
Enhanced cloud ADC features
i4600 may see:
Basic feature updates
Gradual phase-out in 5+ years
Choose the F5 BIG-IP LTM i5800 if:
✔ Handling millions of connections
✔ Need 40G+ throughput
✔ Running mission-critical applications
✔ Budget allows for premium performance
Opt for the F5 BIG-IP i4600 if:
✔ Managing moderate traffic (up to 20Gbps)
✔ Require cost-effective ADC
✔ Deploying in smaller data centers
✔ Don’t need ultra-high scalability
Best Deployment Strategy:
Use i5800 for core data centers
Deploy i4600 for branch offices or DR sites
Both models deliver F5’s industry-leading ADC capabilities, but the choice depends on scale, performance needs, and budget.