
When selecting an application delivery controller (ADC), choosing between the F5 BIG-IP LTM i5800 (high-end model) and the F5 BIG-IP i4600 (mid-range model) depends on performance needs, scalability, and budget. This comparison breaks down their technical specifications, functional differences, and ideal use cases to help network administrators make the right decision.
| Feature | F5 BIG-IP LTM i5800 | F5 BIG-IP i4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | 16-core 3.0 GHz | 8-core 2.4 GHz |
| System Memory | 64 GB DDR4 | 32 GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 960 GB SSD | 480 GB SSD |
| Throughput Capacity | 40 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
| SSL/TLS Performance | 20 Gbps | 10 Gbps |
| Maximum Connections | 2 million | 1 million |
| Power Consumption | 350W (typical) | 220W (typical) |
| Network Interfaces | 16x 10/25G SFP28 | 8x 1/10G SFP+ |
The i5800 offers double the performance in processing power, memory, and throughput, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise deployments, while the i4600 provides a cost-effective solution for medium-sized businesses.
Both models support:
Layer 4-7 load balancing
SSL/TLS offloading
Application health monitoring
Web application firewall (WAF)
DNS load balancing
i5800 Advantages:
Higher connection handling (2M vs 1M)
Better SSL inspection performance
Advanced traffic shaping for large-scale environments
i4600 Strengths:
Sufficient for most mid-sized businesses
Lower power consumption
More budget-friendly
i5800 excels in:
High-volume DDoS protection
Advanced rate shaping
Granular traffic analytics
i4600 is optimized for:
Standard security policies
Moderate traffic loads
Basic WAF configurations
Chassis & Build:
i5800:
2RU form factor
Redundant power supplies (optional)
High-density port configuration
i4600:
1RU compact design
Single power supply
Space-efficient for smaller data centers
Environmental Specs:
Operating temperature: 0°C to 40°C (both)
Weight:
i5800: 30 lbs
i4600: 20 lbs
Noise levels:
i5800: 65 dB (higher due to cooling needs)
i4600: 55 dB (quieter operation)
Administration:
Both use F5 TMOS (Traffic Management Operating System)
Web-based GUI (F5 Configuration Utility)
CLI access via tmsh (TMOS Shell)
REST API for automation
Operational Differences:
i5800 is better for:
Large enterprises with complex policies
High-availability setups
Multi-tenant environments
i4600 is ideal for:
Simpler deployments
Single-site load balancing
Lower administrative overhead
Initial Purchase Cost:
i5800: 65,000–80,000
i4600: 35,000–45,000
5-Year TCO Considerations:
i5800 justified for:
High-traffic websites
Financial services with strict compliance
Cloud-scale ADC needs
i4600 more economical for:
Medium business applications
Branch office deployments
Cost-sensitive projects
Energy Usage:
i5800: 350W (peak)
i4600: 220W (peak)
Efficiency Metrics:
Performance per watt:
i5800: 114 Mbps/W
i4600: 90 Mbps/W
Idle power draw:
i5800: 180W
i4600: 120W
Third-Party Integration:
Both support:
VMware, KVM, Hyper-V
AWS, Azure, GCP
Ansible, Terraform automation
i5800 Advantages:
More 25G/40G ports for high-speed networks
Better scalability for future upgrades
Supports advanced SDN integrations
i4600 Limitations:
Fewer high-speed ports
Limited expansion slots
Current Software Versions:
Both run TMOS 16.x+
Support for iRules, iApps, iControl REST API
Maintenance & Updates:
i5800 receives:
Priority firmware updates
Extended security patches
i4600 has:
Standard support lifecycle
Regular vulnerability fixes
Future-Proofing:
i5800 will likely get:
AI-driven traffic optimization
Enhanced cloud ADC features
i4600 may see:
Basic feature updates
Gradual phase-out in 5+ years
Choose the F5 BIG-IP LTM i5800 if:
✔ Handling millions of connections
✔ Need 40G+ throughput
✔ Running mission-critical applications
✔ Budget allows for premium performance
Opt for the F5 BIG-IP i4600 if:
✔ Managing moderate traffic (up to 20Gbps)
✔ Require cost-effective ADC
✔ Deploying in smaller data centers
✔ Don’t need ultra-high scalability
Best Deployment Strategy:
Use i5800 for core data centers
Deploy i4600 for branch offices or DR sites
Both models deliver F5’s industry-leading ADC capabilities, but the choice depends on scale, performance needs, and budget.