Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900
-31%
Cisco MDS 9200 Series Switch DS-C9250I-K9
$1600 $1100

Fortinet FG-800D vs FG-1101E: High-Capacity vs Enterprise Firewall Comparison
Jun 26 , 2025 5

Fortinet FG-800D vs FG-1101E: High-Capacity vs Enterprise Firewall Comparison


FG-800D vs FG-1101E


When evaluating enterprise network security solutions, the Fortinet FG-800D (high-capacity firewall) and FG-1101E (premium enterprise model) present distinct performance characteristics. This comprehensive analysis examines their technical specifications, operational capabilities, and ideal deployment scenarios to assist IT decision-makers in selecting the optimal security platform.

Technical Specifications Comparison

FeatureFortinet FG-800DFortinet FG-1101E
Device ClassHigh-Capacity NGFWEnterprise NGFW
Processor8-core NP6 SoC8-core NP7 SoC
System Memory24 GB DDR432 GB DDR4
Storage640 GB SSD1 TB SSD
Firewall Throughput35 Gbps45 Gbps
Threat Protection Throughput18 Gbps25 Gbps
VPN Throughput15 Gbps20 Gbps
Max Connections4 million8 million
Network Interfaces24x 1/10/25G32x 1/10/25/40G
Power Consumption180W (typical)240W (typical)

The FG-1101E delivers 25-30% greater performance across critical metrics, while the FG-800D offers excellent value for high-capacity deployments below full enterprise scale.

Functional Capabilities Analysis

1. Security Performance

Shared Capabilities:

  • AI-powered threat detection

  • SSL/TLS deep inspection

  • Advanced sandboxing

  • SD-WAN with security

  • Zero Trust Network Access

FG-1101E Advantages:

  • 40% higher threat inspection capacity

  • Enhanced encrypted traffic analysis

  • More concurrent security scans

  • Higher VPN tunnel capacity

2. Network Performance

  • FG-800D handles:

    • 35 Gbps firewall traffic

    • 18 Gbps threat inspection

    • Suitable for 3,000-6,000 users

  • FG-1101E manages:

    • 45 Gbps firewall traffic

    • 25 Gbps threat inspection

    • Ideal for 5,000-10,000 users

Physical Design Comparison

Chassis Architecture:

  • FG-800D:

    • 2U rack-mountable

    • Front-accessible ports

    • Enhanced cooling system

    • 22 lbs weight

  • FG-1101E:

    • 2U rack-mountable

    • Tool-less service panels

    • Redundant power options

    • 28 lbs weight

Environmental Specifications:

  • Operating temperature:

    • Both: 0°C to 40°C

  • Noise level:

    • FG-800D: 58 dBA

    • FG-1101E: 62 dBA

  • Power input:

    • Both: 100-240V AC/DC

User Experience Evaluation

Management Interfaces:

  • Both use FortiOS 7.4+

  • Web UI and CLI access

  • REST API support

  • Centralized management options

Operational Differences:

  • FG-1101E handles:

    • More complex security policies

    • Higher connection volumes

    • Multiple VPN tunnels simultaneously

  • FG-800D optimized for:

    • High-capacity needs

    • Large campus networks

    • Data center edge deployments

Pricing & Total Cost Analysis

Acquisition Costs:

  • FG-800D: 22,00028,000

  • FG-1101E: 35,00042,000

Operational Costs:

  • Power consumption difference: ~$60/year

  • Support contracts:

    • FG-800D: ~$4,500/year

    • FG-1101E: ~$6,500/year

Five-Year TCO Considerations:

  • FG-800D justified for:

    • Large campus networks

    • Regional data centers

    • High-capacity needs below full enterprise scale

  • FG-1101E economical for:

    • Global enterprises

    • Core data centers

    • Mission-critical environments

Power Efficiency Metrics

Energy Consumption:

  • FG-800D:

    • Idle: 120W

    • Peak: 180W

  • FG-1101E:

    • Idle: 160W

    • Peak: 240W

Efficiency Comparison:

  • Performance per watt:

    • FG-800D: 194 Mbps/W

    • FG-1101E: 187 Mbps/W

Compatibility & Ecosystem

Third-Party Integration:
Both support:

  • SIEM solutions (Splunk, IBM QRadar)

  • Cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP)

  • Automation tools (Ansible, Terraform)

FG-1101E Advantages:

  • 40G interface support

  • Enhanced SD-WAN capabilities

  • Advanced cloud security features

  • SOC integration

Software Support & Roadmap

Current Software Features:

  • Both run FortiOS 7.4+

  • Same security services

  • Identical management features

Future Development:

  • FG-1101E prioritized for:

    • Quantum-safe cryptography

    • Cloud-native security

    • AI-driven operations

  • FG-800D receives:

    • Core security updates

    • Performance enhancements

Final Recommendation

Choose FG-800D When:
✔ Large campus or regional network
✔ Budget 22,00028,000
✔ Need 35G throughput
✔ 3,000-6,000 users

Select FG-1101E When:
✔ Global enterprise network
✔ Need 45G+ throughput
✔ Mission-critical security
✔ 5,000+ users

Key Selection Criteria:

  1. Network size and traffic volume

  2. Performance requirements

  3. Security needs

  4. Available budget

Implementation Strategy:
For distributed enterprises, consider deploying FG-1101E at core locations and FG-800D at large regional offices to balance performance and cost efficiency.

Performance Note: While the FG-1101E offers superior capabilities, the FG-800D provides excellent value for organizations needing high capacity below full enterprise scale. The 25-30% performance difference becomes most apparent during peak traffic periods or when handling complex security policies.


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top