Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900
-31%
Cisco MDS 9200 Series Switch DS-C9250I-K9
$1600 $1100

Fortinet FG-900D vs FG-1101E: Next-Gen Firewall Performance Comparison for Enterprise Networks
Jun 26 , 2025 26

Fortinet FG-900D vs FG-1101E: Next-Gen Firewall Performance Comparison for Enterprise Networks


FG-900D vs FG-1101E


When selecting enterprise-grade firewalls, network administrators often compare Fortinet's FG-900D and FG-1101E models. While both offer robust security features, they cater to different network scales and performance requirements. This comprehensive analysis examines their technical specifications, operational capabilities, and ideal deployment scenarios to help IT professionals make informed decisions.

Technical Specifications Comparison

FeatureFortinet FG-900DFortinet FG-1101E
Device ClassMid-Range NGFWEnterprise NGFW
Processor6-core NP7 SoC8-core NP7 SoC
System Memory12 GB DDR416 GB DDR4
Storage480 GB SSD512 GB SSD
Firewall Throughput25 Gbps30 Gbps
Threat Protection Throughput15 Gbps20 Gbps
VPN Throughput12 Gbps15 Gbps
Max Connections3 million5 million
Network Interfaces12x 1/10/25G16x 1/10/25G
Power Consumption120W (typical)150W (typical)

The FG-1101E demonstrates 20-30% better performance across key metrics, making it better suited for large-scale enterprise deployments.

Functional Capabilities Analysis

1. Security Performance

Shared Capabilities:

  • AI-powered threat detection

  • SSL/TLS inspection

  • Advanced malware protection

  • SD-WAN with security

  • Zero Trust Network Access

FG-1101E Advantages:

  • 33% higher threat inspection capacity

  • Supports more concurrent deep packet inspections

  • Better performance with encrypted traffic

2. Network Performance

  • FG-900D handles:

    • 25 Gbps firewall traffic

    • 15 Gbps threat inspection

    • Suitable for 1,000-2,000 users

  • FG-1101E manages:

    • 30 Gbps firewall traffic

    • 20 Gbps threat inspection

    • Ideal for 2,000-5,000 users

Physical Design Comparison

Chassis Architecture:

  • FG-900D:

    • 1U rack-mountable

    • Front-accessible ports

    • Dual hot-swappable fans

    • 12.5 lbs weight

  • FG-1101E:

    • 1U rack-mountable

    • Enhanced cooling system

    • Tool-less serviceability

    • 15 lbs weight

Environmental Specifications:

  • Operating temperature:

    • Both: 0°C to 40°C

  • Noise level:

    • FG-900D: 55 dBA

    • FG-1101E: 60 dBA

  • Power input:

    • Both: 100-240V AC

User Experience Evaluation

Management Interfaces:

  • Both use FortiOS 7.4+

  • Identical web UI and CLI

  • REST API support

  • Centralized management via FortiManager

Operational Differences:

  • FG-1101E handles:

    • More complex rule sets

    • Higher connection volumes

    • Multiple VPN tunnels

  • FG-900D optimized for:

    • Simpler deployments

    • Medium-sized networks

    • Standard security policies

Pricing & Total Cost Analysis

Acquisition Costs:

  • FG-900D: 12,00015,000

  • FG-1101E: 18,00022,000

Operational Costs:

  • Power consumption difference: ~$60/year

  • Support contracts:

    • FG-900D: ~$3,000/year

    • FG-1101E: ~$4,500/year

Five-Year TCO Considerations:

  • FG-900D justified for:

    • Medium enterprises

    • Distributed offices

    • Cost-sensitive deployments

  • FG-1101E economical for:

    • Large enterprises

    • Data center edge

    • High-security environments

Power Efficiency Metrics

Energy Consumption:

  • FG-900D:

    • Idle: 80W

    • Peak: 120W

  • FG-1101E:

    • Idle: 100W

    • Peak: 150W

Efficiency Comparison:

  • Performance per watt:

    • FG-900D: 208 Mbps/W

    • FG-1101E: 200 Mbps/W

Compatibility & Ecosystem

Third-Party Integration:
Both support:

  • SIEM solutions (Splunk, IBM QRadar)

  • Cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP)

  • Automation tools (Ansible, Terraform)

FG-1101E Advantages:

  • More 25G interfaces

  • Better SD-WAN scalability

  • Enhanced cloud security features

Software Support & Roadmap

Current Software Features:

  • Both run FortiOS 7.4+

  • Same security services

  • Identical management features

Future Development:

  • FG-1101E prioritized for:

    • Advanced threat analytics

    • Cloud-native security

    • AI-driven operations

  • FG-900D receives:

    • Core security updates

    • Performance enhancements

Final Recommendation

Choose FG-900D When:
✔ Medium-sized enterprise network
✔ Budget under $15,000
✔ Need 25G throughput
✔ Standard security requirements

Select FG-1101E When:
✔ Large enterprise deployment
✔ Need 30G+ throughput
✔ Advanced threat protection
✔ Future scalability required

Key Selection Criteria:

  1. Network size and user count

  2. Performance requirements

  3. Security needs

  4. Budget constraints

Implementation Strategy:
For organizations with distributed networks, consider deploying FG-1101E at central locations and FG-900D at branch offices to balance performance and cost efficiency.

Performance Note: While the FG-1101E offers better specs, the FG-900D provides excellent value for mid-sized enterprises that don't require maximum throughput capacity.


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top