Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-52%
Cisco C6800-8P40G-XL Catalyst 6800 Series 8-Port 40 Gigabit Ethernet Module
$81347 $38800
-94%
C6800-48P-TX-XL Cisco 6807 Switch Gigabit Ethernet Copper Module with DFC4XL
$24200 $1400
-26%
A9K-RSP880-SE Cisco ASR 9000 Series Route Switch Processor 880
$5833 $4300
-86%
Cisco ASR 9000 Service Module A9K-2T20GE-B
$3454 $500
-25%
A99-12X100GE
$22500 $16806

A9K-4X100GE-TR vs A9K-MOD400-TR: A Comprehensive Technical Breakdown
Jul 04 , 2025 166

A9K-4X100GE-TR vs A9K-MOD400-TR: A Comprehensive Technical Breakdown


A9K-4X100GE-TR vs A9K-MOD400-TR


When upgrading network infrastructure, choosing the right hardware is crucial for performance, scalability, and cost efficiency. The Cisco A9K-4X100GE-TR and A9K-MOD400-TR are both high-performance modules designed for modern data centers, but they cater to different networking demands. This comparison examines their technical specifications, design, usability, and pricing to help you decide which one fits your needs.

Performance Comparison

FeatureA9K-4X100GE-TRA9K-MOD400-TR
Processing Speed400 Gbps (4x100G ports)400 Gbps (4x100G ports)
Memory (RAM)24 GB DDR432 GB DDR4
Storage Capacity192 GB SSD256 GB SSD
Power Consumption180W250W
Price Range12,00015,00015,00018,000

Key Takeaways:

  • Both modules offer 400G throughput, but the A9K-MOD400-TR has more memory and storage.

  • The A9K-4X100GE-TR is more power-efficient, making it better for environments where energy costs matter.

  • The A9K-MOD400-TR is slightly more expensive but provides better scalability for future upgrades.

Feature Analysis

1. Design & Build Quality

  • A9K-4X100GE-TR: Optimized for 100G deployments with a compact, power-efficient design.

  • A9K-MOD400-TR: Built for high-density 400G-ready networks, featuring enhanced cooling for sustained performance.

2. User Experience

  • A9K-4X100GE-TR: Easier to integrate into existing 100G networks with straightforward configuration.

  • A9K-MOD400-TR: Requires more advanced setup but supports higher traffic loads and future 400G upgrades.

3. Power Efficiency & Heat Management

  • The A9K-4X100GE-TR consumes 180W, making it more energy-efficient than the A9K-MOD400-TR (250W).

  • The A9K-MOD400-TR needs better airflow and cooling due to its higher power draw.

4. Compatibility & Expandability

  • Both support Cisco IOS XR, but the A9K-MOD400-TR is designed for next-gen 400G deployments.

  • The A9K-4X100GE-TR is ideal for current 100G networks without immediate 400G requirements.

5. Software & Firmware Support

  • Both receive regular Cisco updates, ensuring security and performance optimizations.

  • The A9K-MOD400-TR includes advanced traffic shaping for large-scale data centers.

Final Recommendation

  • Choose A9K-4X100GE-TR if you need a cost-effective, power-efficient 100G solution with solid performance.

  • Opt for A9K-MOD400-TR if you require higher memory, storage, and future-proof 400G scalability.

Your decision should depend on whether you prioritize current efficiency (A9K-4X100GE-TR) or future readiness (A9K-MOD400-TR). Both are excellent choices, but their best use cases differ.


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top