​Cisco C9300-24UXB-A vs C9300-24UB-E: In-Depth Comparison for Enterprise Networking

Jul 22 , 2025 6

Cisco C9300-24UXB-A vs C9300-24UB-E: In-Depth Comparison for Enterprise Networking

In enterprise network device selection, the "UXB" and "UB" suffixes often signal functional positioning. The Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series models C9300-24UXB-A (enhanced intelligent access) and C9300-24UB-E (basic access) are a prime example—both target enterprise access/aggregation (24 Gigabit Ethernet ports + 4 SFP+ 10G optical ports), but their differences lie in intelligent features vs. basic performance. This article breaks down their distinctions across hardware specs, functionality, and real-world deployment to guide your choice.

1. Performance Differences: Hardware Positioning Dictates "Processing Limits"

The "UXB" suffix denotes Cisco’s enhanced enterprise-grade access/aggregation switch, while "UB" represents a basic model. Their performance differences stem from hardware design:

• Processing Speed:

• C9300-24UXB-A: Equipped with Cisco’s custom "Eagle" ASIC chip (enhanced), delivering 360Gbps switching capacity and 120Mpps packet forwarding (64-byte packets). Handles 1200+ concurrent 1080P video streams or 600+ IP phones, ideal for small, high-density spaces like meeting rooms.

• C9300-24UB-E: Uses a basic "Hawk" ASIC chip, with 240Gbps switching capacity and 80Mpps packet forwarding. Suitable for 800+ 720P video streams or 300+ IP phones, better for large, distributed spaces like campus offices.

• Running Memory:

• C9300-24UXB-A: 4GB DDR4 DRAM (expandable to 8GB) supports complex tasks (e.g., IPv6 routing, multi-layered security policies).

• C9300-24UB-E: 2GB DDR4 DRAM (non-expandable) handles basic VLAN configuration but may lag with heavy ACL loads.

• Storage Capacity:

• C9300-24UXB-A: 4GB eMMC flash (expandable to 32GB) stores the latest IOS XE 17.12.x and 1 year of detailed logs.

• C9300-24UB-E: 2GB eMMC flash (non-expandable) supports older IOS XE 16.12.x with 6 months of logs.

2. Feature Set: Overlapping Software, Divergent Intelligence

Both support Cisco DNA Center, but UXB’s "enhanced" status unlocks advanced capabilities:

• Shared Features:
  Both support automated configuration (DNA Center bulk policy deployment), basic security (802.1X, MAC filtering), and stacking (UXB up to 8 units, UB up to 4).

• Differentiated Features:

• C9300-24UXB-A: AI-driven traffic optimization, full IPv6 stack support, and hardware-level MACSec encryption (critical for finance/healthcare).

• C9300-24UB-E: Focuses on stability, with basic IPv4 management and static routing for traditional enterprises.

3. Design & Appearance: Industrial Details Reflect Function

Their physical designs reflect port density and cooling needs:

• Port Layout:

• C9300-24UXB-A: 24 Gigabit ports (front 16/rear 8) + 4 SFP+ 10G optical ports (vertical right), compact size (~35cm×44cm×4.4cm) for desktops/shallow cabinets.

• C9300-24UB-E: 24 Gigabit ports (front 24/rear 0) + 4 SFP+ 10G optical ports (horizontal top), wider body (~53cm×44cm×4.4cm) for deep cabinets.

• Cooling Design:

• C9300-24UXB-A: "Front-in, rear-out" dual-fan system optimized for ≤25℃ environments.

• C9300-24UB-E: "Bottom-in, top-out" grille with dust filters for industrial environments.

• Certifications:

• C9300-24UXB-A: Labeled "Enhanced," manual emphasizes "intelligent access"; certifications focus on EU (CE) and financial industry (PCI DSS).

• C9300-24UB-E: Labeled "Basic," manual highlights "universal access"; certifications cover global markets (China CCC, Japan PSE).

4. User Experience: Resolving IT Admins’ "Scenario Anxiety"

For IT teams, "usability" hinges on alignment with operational capabilities:

• Deployment:

• C9300-24UXB-A: Ideal for small, dense scenarios (e.g., corporate meeting rooms), requiring no future expansion.

• C9300-24UB-E: Suits large, broad scenarios (e.g., campus offices), with lower initial cost but potential扩容 needs.

• Daily Management:

• C9300-24UXB-A: DNA Center’s "smart recommendations" simplify configuration for less experienced admins; detailed logs speed up troubleshooting.

• C9300-24UB-E: Relies on manual CLI configuration, requiring higher technical expertise; logs lack granularity, increasing diagnostic time.

• Troubleshooting:

• C9300-24UXB-A: Built-in tools reduce average troubleshooting time to ≤15 minutes.

• C9300-24UB-E: Limited to basic CLI commands; complex issues require Cisco support (≥4-hour response).

5. Cost-Effectiveness: Price Gap ≠ Total Cost—Choose by Scenario

C9300-24UXB-A costs 1.5-1.8x more than C9300-24UB-E (due to hardware/performance differences). Total cost depends on scenario needs:

• Choose C9300-24UXB-A if: Small, high-density spaces (e.g., financial branches, medical clinics) or future AI feature needs; saves 25% long-term costs for 100-user offices.

• Choose C9300-24UB-E if: Large-scale access (e.g., campus offices, hospitals) or budget constraints; saves 35% long-term costs for 200-user offices.

6. Product Advantages: Scenario-Driven "Design Philosophy"

C9300’s edge lies in "on-demand design"—UXB and UB exemplify this:

• C9300-24UXB-A: "Intelligent benchmark for small scenes," addressing "small device, big demand" pain points.

• C9300-24UB-E: "Economic pillar for large scenes," solving "wide coverage, low cost" needs.

7. System Upgrades: Similar Steps, 3 Key Details

Upgrade processes are consistent, but watch these scenario-specific issues:

Upgrade Steps:

1. Download model-specific firmware from Cisco’s website.

2. Navigate to "Administration > Software Upgrade" in the Web UI, upload firmware, and select "Immediate Upgrade" (or use CLI: archive download-sw /force-reload tftp://ip/firmware.bin).

3. Wait for auto-validation (~5min), old config backup (~2min), and installation (~8min)—network remains uninterrupted.

4. Post-upgrade, check logs for errors (look for "%SYS-5-CONFIG_I" for success).

Common Issues & Fixes:

• Issue 1: UXB-A loses AI functionality post-upgrade.
  Cause: Firmware-hardware incompatibility.
  Fix: Confirm compatibility on Cisco’s website; update firmware or contact support.

• Issue 2: UB-E fails to recognize ports after upgrade.
  Cause: Firmware corruption or unstable TFTP transfer.
  Fix: Re-upload firmware via Console (recovery mode) or use local USB for stability.

8. Use Cases: Scenario-Specific "Precision Deployment"

Typical deployments highlight their scenario fit:

• Case 1: Financial Branch Office (C9300-24UXB-A)
  A branch needs 80+ endpoints (teller PCs, ATMs, IP cameras) with 4K video conferencing and cloud collaboration. UXB-A’s 360Gbps capacity, AI traffic prioritization, and 24-port expansion meet these needs.

• Case 2: Community Hospital (C9300-24UB-E)
  A hospital needs 150+ patient terminals (computers, printers) with stable web browsing. UB-E’s 240Gbps capacity, 48-port coverage, and basic security policies fully satisfy daily use.

Conclusion: UXB-A or UB-E? It’s About "Scene Fit"

The core difference between C9300-24UXB-A and C9300-24UB-E lies in scenario adaptation. Choose UXB-A for small, smart spaces needing advanced features; opt for UB-E in large, cost-sensitive scenarios. Either way, they’re reliable partners for enterprise networking—for IT admins, "matching the scene, not just the specs," is the ultimate value.