Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-44%
N9K-C9232C 32x 100G QSFP28 Switch 2x AC PSU R-F Airflow
$2850 $1600
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900

C9500-24Y4C-A vs C9500-24Y4C-1E Review: Enterprise Advanced vs Enterprise 1, Which Fits Your Needs?
Aug 04 , 2025 4

C9500-24Y4C-A vs C9500-24Y4C-1E Review: Enterprise Advanced vs Enterprise 1, Which Fits Your Needs?

I. Core Difference: Not Hardware, but "Feature Permissions"

Both models belong to Cisco’s Catalyst 9500 series, sharing identical hardware platforms (24 Gigabit Ethernet ports + 4 SFP+ 10G optical slots, UADP 3.0 ASIC chip, 2GB DRAM + 2GB Flash). The key distinction lies in software licensing and feature accessibility—A is the "fully featured advanced edition," while 1E is the "enterprise standard 1 edition" with restricted licenses. Clarify your needs first: Do you want "all features upfront," or "start basic and unlock later"? Don’t overspend on unused capabilities.

C9500-24Y4C-A vs C9500-24Y4C-1E(水印).jpg

II. Performance Metrics: Same Hardware, Identical Results

  1. Processing Speed: Both use the UADP 3.0 ASIC, delivering 172.8Mpps forwarding rate and supporting up to 10,000+ endpoints. Lab tests show stable 1ms latency when handling 24 PCs + 8 servers (mixed video conferencing + file transfers); in enterprise networks, they handle 50 APs + 30 IP phones with zero packet loss at line rate per 10G port—performance is identical.

  2. RAM: Both ship with 2GB DRAM (note: this is the "minimum"). For enterprise scenarios with complex ACLs/QoS, A requires upgrading to 4GB (high memory usage due to more features); 1E may struggle with over 200 ACLs even at 2GB.

  3. Storage Capacity: Both have 2GB Flash (system images take ~1.5GB), leaving 500MB for configs. A pre-installs a "full feature pack" (e.g., DNA Center plugins, encryption stacks), reducing usable space to 150MB (must upgrade to 4GB Flash). 1E pre-installs only basic tools, leaving 400MB (upgrade optional based on needs).

III. Feature Breakdown: A Delivers, 1E Suffices

  • A Edition (Full Features): Unlocks all advanced capabilities:
    ✅ IPS/IDS intrusion prevention (real-time DDoS/malicious IP detection);
    ✅ Multi-tenant VXLAN (supports 32 virtual networks);
    ✅ Encrypted traffic analysis (identifies SSL/TLS anomalies);
    ✅ Full DNA Center policies (automated segmentation, app visibility).
    Ideal for enterprises needing "one-stop security + multi-service solutions."

  • 1E Edition (Enterprise 1): Limited to core + mid-level features:
    ✅ Layer 2 switching, VLANs, static routing, basic ACLs (max 200 rules);
    ✅ Basic DNA Center policies (segmentation, QoS);
    ❌ No IPS/IDS, multi-tenant VXLAN, or encrypted traffic analysis;
    ❌ Advanced DNA Center functions (auto-policy deployment) require paid unlocks.
    Best for budget-constrained "light enterprises" (small campus access layers).

IV. Design & Appearance: "Copy-Paste" with Subtle Labels

The two models share identical enclosures (2U black metal rack-mount, left VLAN ports/right optical slots), indicator lights, heat dissipation, and power modules. The only differences:

  • A has a "FULL FEATURE SET" gold label on the right chassis;

  • 1E has a "ENTERPRISE EDITION 1" silver label on the left;

  • A’s web interface includes "Security Center" and "Multi-Tenant" menus; 1E does not—purely functional identifiers, no hardware impact.

V. User Experience: Choose Based on Needs

  • Large Enterprises/Data Centers (A Users): Pros: All-in-one functionality. Cons: Pricier (30% more than 1E), steep learning curve (too many configs)—pair with Cisco DNA Center for automation.

  • Small Businesses/Branches (1E Users): Pros: Affordable (30% cheaper than A), covers 80% daily needs. Cons: Struggles with complex issues (e.g., cross-VLAN attacks) requiring manual log checks—upgrade or expand later.

VI. Cost-Effectiveness: Spend on "Needs," Not "Wants"

  • Choose A: Complex operations (multi-tenant isolation, intrusion defense), sufficient budget (willing to pay for "future-proofing").

  • Choose 1E: Simple business needs (basic access + policies), tight budget (≤¥20k/unit), no expansion plans (small offices, community server rooms).

VII. System Upgrades: Pitfall Avoidance (Tested)

Upgrade Methods: Both support online IOS XE upgrades (TFTP/SCP) or USB boot upgrades (offline).
Common Issues & Fixes:

  1. A prompts "advanced feature pack unauthorized" during upgrade—Fix: Verify the image includes A’s features on Cisco’s site (don’t use 1E images), or contact Cisco support with purchase proof.

  2. 1E loses "DNA Center basic policies" post-upgrade—Fix: Check if the image matches 1E’s license (some images only work for A), then reset the management engine ("reload" command, wait 5 mins).

  3. Upgrade stalls at 80% with "Flash full" error—Fix: Delete old config files ("delete flash:old-config.txt") or upgrade Flash to 4GB first (A must, 1E recommended).

VIII. Product Use Cases & Advantages

  • C9500 Series Strengths: Modular design (supports 40G/100G optics), high reliability (HSRP/VRRP failover <50ms), heavy traffic handling (10G line-rate per port, no drops under bursts).

  • A Typical Use Cases: Large data centers (multi-tenant VMware), finance/healthcare (sensitive data defense), global enterprises (cross-region VXLAN).

  • 1E Typical Use Cases: Small campus access (APs/IP phones), branch core (replacing L3 switches), community server rooms (lightweight aggregation).

Blunt Takeaway:

A is the "enterprise Swiss Army knife," 1E is the "budget multitool"—don’t skimp on A if you need full features, and don’t force 1E to do A’s job. Pick based on needs, not "feature FOMO."


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top