Network professionals evaluating Cisco routing solutions must understand the fundamental differences between the ASR1002-HX (compact enterprise router) and DS-C9513 (hyperscale core router). This technical analysis provides an objective comparison of their capabilities, performance characteristics, and ideal deployment scenarios.
Feature | Cisco ASR1002-HX | Cisco DS-C9513 |
---|---|---|
Device Class | Enterprise Edge Router | Hyperscale Core Router |
Chassis Type | 1RU fixed | 13-slot modular |
Processor | 8-core X86 | 64-core Silicon One |
System Memory | 32 GB DDR4 | 1 TB DDR4 |
Storage | 240 GB SSD | 8 TB NVMe SSD |
Forwarding Capacity | 40 Gbps | 3.6 Tbps |
Max Interfaces | 16x 1/10/25G | 512x 100/400G |
Power Supply | Single 600W AC | Six 8000W DC |
Power Consumption | 180W (typical) | 6.5 kW (typical) |
Latency | 20 μs | <1 μs |
The DS-C9513 delivers 90x greater performance than the ASR1002-HX, reflecting its hyperscale data center design versus the compact enterprise solution.
Shared Capabilities:
BGP/OSPF/IS-IS routing
Basic QoS policies
ACL filtering
NetFlow monitoring
DS-C9513 Exclusive Features:
Segment routing (SRv6)
Nanosecond latency
800G interface readiness
Non-blocking architecture
Deep packet buffers (256MB)
ASR1002-HX excels in:
Branch office connectivity
Small enterprise edge
Basic VPN termination
DS-C9513 optimized for:
Cloud provider cores
AI/ML workload fabrics
Hyperscale peering points
Chassis Architecture:
ASR1002-HX:
1RU fixed configuration
Front-access design
Integrated cooling
18 lbs weight
Office-optimized
DS-C9513:
21RU modular chassis
Front/rear service access
Hot-swappable fabric cards
450 lbs empty weight
Data center cooling system
Environmental Specifications:
Operating temperature:
ASR1002-HX: 0°C to 40°C
DS-C9513: 5°C to 27°C
Acoustic noise:
ASR1002-HX: 55 dBA
DS-C9513: 85 dBA
Power options:
ASR1002-HX: AC only
DS-C9513: DC/HVDC only
Management Interfaces:
Both support:
CLI access
SNMP monitoring
Basic automation
DS-C9513 Advanced Features:
Model-driven telemetry
gRPC/NETCONF interfaces
AI-driven optimization
Kubernetes networking
Operational Differences:
ASR1002-HX designed for:
IT generalists
Office environments
Remote management
DS-C9513 requires:
Data center specialists
High-voltage power training
Specialized cooling knowledge
Acquisition Costs:
ASR1002-HX: 15,000−25,000
DS-C9513: 850,000−1.2M
Operational Expenditures:
Power consumption difference: ~$8,000/year
Rack space requirements:
DS-C9513 needs 21x more space
Support contracts:
DS-C9513 requires 24/7 premium SLA
Five-Year TCO Considerations:
DS-C9513 justified for:
Hyperscale applications
Cloud infrastructure
Future-proof investments
ASR1002-HX economical for:
Small enterprise networks
Remote offices
Budget-conscious projects
Energy Usage:
ASR1002-HX:
Idle: 120W
Peak: 220W
DS-C9513:
Idle: 4.2 kW
Peak: 8.1 kW
Efficiency Comparison:
Performance per watt:
ASR1002-HX: 181 Mbps/W
DS-C9513: 553 Mbps/W
Third-Party Integration:
Both support:
Basic SNMP monitoring
Syslog reporting
Limited automation
DS-C9513 Advantages:
Cloud orchestration
CI/CD pipeline integration
OpenConfig support
AI workload optimization
Current Software Features:
ASR1002-HX: IOS-XE 17.x
DS-C9513: IOS-XR 7.x
Different feature sets
Future Development:
DS-C9513 prioritized for:
1.6T interfaces
AI networking
Cloud-native routing
ASR1002-HX focused on:
Security hardening
SD-WAN features
Basic maintenance
Choose ASR1002-HX When:
✔ Small enterprise edge deployment
✔ Budget under $30,000
✔ Standard office environment
✔ IT generalist management
Select DS-C9513 When:
✔ Hyperscale data center core
✔ Need terabit routing
✔ AI/ML workload support
✔ Specialized DC infrastructure
Implementation Strategy:
Deploy DS-C9513 in cloud cores and ASR1002-HX at small enterprise edges to create a hierarchical network architecture.
Key Differentiators:
Performance: 3.6T vs 40G forwarding
Scale: 512x vs 16x interfaces
Environment: DC vs office deployment
Operations: Specialized vs standard
Technical Note: These routers serve fundamentally different purposes - the DS-C9513 for cloud providers and the ASR1002-HX for small enterprise networks. The massive performance gap reflects their distinct design philosophies and target markets.