Cisco WS-C4500X-40X-ES vs. WS-C4500X-24X-ES: A Detailed Comparison

Introduction

Choosing the right enterprise switch depends on performance, scalability, and cost-efficiency. This comparison evaluates two Cisco Catalyst 4500-X models—the WS-C4500X-40X-ES and WS-C4500X-24X-ES—across key technical and operational aspects to help network administrators make an informed decision.

Performance Comparison

The 40X-ES outperforms the 24X-ES with double the forwarding rate and switching capacity, making it ideal for high-bandwidth applications. Its larger memory and storage allow for more complex network policies and faster firmware updates.

Feature Differentiation

• 40X-ES:

• 40 x 10GBase-T ports (copper) with Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE)

• Supports MACsec encryption for enhanced security

• Higher port density for large-scale deployments

• 24X-ES:

• 24 x 10GBase-T ports (copper)

• Optimized for smaller enterprise networks

• Lower power consumption

The 40X-ES is better suited for data centers and high-traffic environments, while the 24X-ES is a cost-effective solution for smaller offices or branch locations.

Design & Build Quality

• Both models feature a 1RU chassis for space efficiency.

• The 40X-ES has better heat dissipation due to an enhanced cooling system.

• The 24X-ES has a simpler design, making it easier to install in compact spaces.

User Experience Feedback

• 40X-ES users report smooth performance under heavy loads but note higher fan noise.

• 24X-ES is praised for its ease of setup and quieter operation, ideal for office environments.

Price Comparison

• WS-C4500X-40X-ES: $18,000–$20,000

• WS-C4500X-24X-ES: $11,800–$13,400

The 24X-ES is more budget-friendly, while the 40X-ES justifies its higher cost with superior performance and scalability.

Power Efficiency

• 40X-ES: 550W typical consumption

• 24X-ES: 320W typical consumption

The 24X-ES is more energy-efficient, making it a better choice for organizations focused on reducing operational costs.

Compatibility & Expansion

Both switches support:

• Cisco IOS XE

• StackWise Virtual for simplified management

• IEEE 1588v2 for precise timing

The 40X-ES offers greater expansion slots, allowing for future upgrades, while the 24X-ES is more limited in scalability.

Software Support & Firmware Updates

Recent updates (2024) include:

• Enhanced security patches for both models

• Improved traffic monitoring on the 40X-ES

• Optimized PoE management on the 24X-ES

Final Recommendation

• Choose the WS-C4500X-40X-ES if you need high performance, scalability, and future-proofing for large networks.

• Opt for the WS-C4500X-24X-ES if you prioritize cost savings, energy efficiency, and simplicity for smaller deployments.

Both models deliver Cisco’s reliability, but the best choice depends on network size, budget, and performance needs.