Selecting the right network switch depends on performance needs, scalability, and budget. This comparison examines two Cisco switches—the compact WS-C3560CX-12TC-S and the enterprise-grade WS-C4500X-24X-ES—to help IT professionals make an informed decision.
Specification | WS-C3560CX-12TC-S | WS-C4500X-24X-ES |
---|---|---|
Forwarding Rate | 24 Gbps | 240 Gbps |
Switching Capacity | 48 Gbps | 480 Gbps |
System Memory | 512 MB DRAM | 4 GB DDR3 |
Storage | 256 MB Flash | 2 GB Flash |
Latency | <10 μsec | <7 μsec |
The WS-C4500X-24X-ES delivers 10x higher forwarding rates and switching capacity, making it ideal for high-performance enterprise networks. The WS-C3560CX-12TC-S, while less powerful, is optimized for small offices and remote deployments with lower bandwidth demands.
WS-C3560CX-12TC-S:
12 x Gigabit Ethernet ports (8 x PoE+)
Compact, fanless design for silent operation
Limited Layer 3 capabilities (basic routing)
WS-C4500X-24X-ES:
24 x 10GBase-T ports for high-speed connectivity
Advanced Layer 3 routing and QoS features
Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE) for power savings
The 3560CX is ideal for small offices, classrooms, or retail spaces, while the 4500X-24X-ES is built for data centers and enterprise core networks.
WS-C3560CX-12TC-S:
Ultra-compact (1.25" height) for space-constrained environments
Fanless operation (no moving parts)
Wall-mountable for flexible installation
WS-C4500X-24X-ES:
Standard 1RU rack-mountable design
Active cooling (fans required)
Robust metal chassis for durability
The 3560CX excels in noise-sensitive environments, while the 4500X is designed for high-density data centers.
3560CX Users:
Easy to deploy in small offices
Silent operation is a major advantage
Limited scalability for growing networks
4500X-24X-ES Users:
Handles heavy traffic effortlessly
More complex setup (requires CLI expertise)
Higher power consumption
WS-C3560CX-12TC-S: 1,200–1,800
WS-C4500X-24X-ES: 11,800–13,400
The 3560CX is a budget-friendly option, while the 4500X is a premium enterprise solution.
WS-C3560CX-12TC-S: 30W (typical, with PoE load)
WS-C4500X-24X-ES: 320W (typical)
The 3560CX is far more energy-efficient, making it ideal for remote offices with power constraints.
Both support:
Cisco IOS (different versions)
VLANs, QoS, and basic security features
WS-C4500X-24X-ES offers:
StackWise Virtual for simplified management
Greater expansion options (module slots)
The 4500X is more future-proof, while the 3560CX is limited to small-scale deployments.
WS-C3560CX-12TC-S:
Limited ongoing updates (legacy-focused)
Basic security patches
WS-C4500X-24X-ES:
Regular firmware updates
Advanced features (MACsec, NetFlow, etc.)
Choose the WS-C3560CX-12TC-S if you need a small, silent, and energy-efficient switch for a low-traffic environment.
Opt for the WS-C4500X-24X-ES if you require high-speed, scalable, and enterprise-grade performance for data centers or large networks.
Both switches serve different needs—select based on your network size, budget, and performance requirements.