Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900
-31%
Cisco MDS 9200 Series Switch DS-C9250I-K9
$1600 $1100
-23%
Juniper Networks QFX10002-72Q-CHAS-C Switch
$3680 $2844

F5 BIG-IP i2800 vs. i4600: Choosing the Right ADC for Your Enterprise Needs
Jun 26 , 2025 46

F5 BIG-IP i2800 vs. i4600: Choosing the Right ADC for Your Enterprise Needs

In the realm of application delivery controllers (ADCs), F5’s BIG-IP series remains a benchmark for performance and reliability. However, selecting between the i2800 and i4600 models hinges on understanding their distinct capabilities. Here’s a detailed comparison to guide your decision.


1. Performance Benchmarks

MetricF5 BIG-IP i2800F5 BIG-IP i4600
Max Throughput2.5 Gbps20 Gbps
Concurrent Connections200,0001.2 million
TLS Transactions/sec20,000200,000
Latency~1 ms (typical)Sub-500 μs (optimized for speed)
RAM8 GB64 GB
Storage480 GB SSD480 GB SSD + Expansion Slot

Why it matters: The i4600’s scalability makes it ideal for large enterprises, while the i2800 offers cost-effective performance for SMBs.

F5-BIG-LTM-I2800 vs F5-BIG-BT-I4600(水印).jpg


2. Feature Breakdown

Featurei2800i4600
SecuritySSL Offload, DDoS MitigationAdvanced WAF, Bot Defense
Traffic ManagementLayer 7 Routing, GTM IntegrationGSLB, Automated Traffic Steering
AnalyticsReal-Time MetricsAI-Driven Predictive Analytics
IntegrationAWS/Azure IntegrationKubernetes Native, Multi-Cloud
CompliancePCI-DSS, HIPAAFedRAMP, GDPR

Key distinction: The i4600’s machine learning-powered analytics proactively identify threats, while the i2800 focuses on stability for smaller environments.


3. Design & Aesthetics

  • i2800: Compact 1 RU form factor, 2 expansion slots, passive cooling.

  • i4600: Rugged 2 RU chassis, 8 expansion slots, redundant power supplies.

Why choose i4600? Its carrier-grade durability ensures uptime in harsh data center environments.


4. User Experience

  • i2800: GUI-centric, suitable for admins with basic scripting skills.

  • i4600: Deep CLI automation, REST API integration, and F5 Automation Toolchain for CI/CD pipelines.

Real-world example: Enterprises deploy the i4600 to automate SSL certificate rotation across 100+ applications.


5. Pricing Structure

  • i2800: ~20k-30k (ideal for budget-sensitive deployments).

  • i4600: 80k-120k (long-term ROI through scalability).

Cost insight: The i4600’s advanced security modules often offset its higher upfront cost by reducing breach-related expenses.


**6. Battery Consumption? Not Exactly…**

Neither model relies on batteries, but the i4600’s energy-efficient processors reduce operational costs by 30% compared to legacy hardware.


7. Compatibility Showdown

Compatibilityi2800i4600
Cloud PlatformsAWS, AzureAWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle Cloud
VirtualizationVMware, Hyper-VVMware, Hyper-V, KVM, Bare Metal
Security PartnersPalo Alto, Check PointPalo Alto, Check Point, CrowdStrike

Edge case: The i4600 natively supports 5G network slicing for telecom providers.


8. Software Muscle

Both run TMOS, F5’s robust OS, but the i4600 adds:

  • iRules LX for custom scripting.

  • NGINX integration for web server offload.

  • SD-WAN overlay for hybrid architectures.


Final Verdict

  • Buy the i2800 if: You need a cost-effective ADC for branch offices or stable workloads.

  • Choose the i4600 if: You’re future-proofing for AI/ML workloads, multi-cloud sprawl, or dynamic scaling.

Crucial question: Does your organization prioritize adaptive security and frictionless scalability? If yes, the i4600’s premium investment safeguards against tech debt.



Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top