Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900
-31%
Cisco MDS 9200 Series Switch DS-C9250I-K9
$1600 $1100

F5 BIG-IP i5800 vs. VPR-LTM C2400-AC: Which Application Delivery Controller Reigns Supreme?
Jun 26 , 2025 5

F5 BIG-IP i5800 vs. VPR-LTM C2400-AC: Which Application Delivery Controller Reigns Supreme?

When architecting modern application infrastructures, F5’s BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) stands as a cornerstone. But selecting between the i5800 (physical appliance) and VPR-LTM C2400-AC (virtual edition) demands a nuanced comparison. Here’s a granular breakdown to inform your decision.


1. Performance Benchmarks

MetricF5 BIG-IP i5800F5 BIG-IP VPR-LTM C2400-AC
Max Throughput2.5 GbpsScalable up to 10 Gbps (VM limits)
Concurrent Connections200,000Unlimited (hypervisor-dependent)
SSL Transactions/sec20,000100,000+ (via vCPU scaling)
Latency~1 ms (optimized for WAN)~500 μs (hypervisor-dependent)
RAM8 GB4-32 GB (configurable in VM)
Storage480 GB SSDN/A (runs on hypervisor storage)

Why it matters: The i5800 excels for edge deployments with fixed bandwidth needs, while the VPR-C2400-AC scales dynamically for cloud-native apps.

F5-BIG-LTM-I5800 vs F5-VPR-LTM-C2400-AC(水印).jpg


2. Feature Matrix

Featurei5800VPR-LTM C2400-AC
SecuritySSL Offload, DDoS MitigationAdvanced WAF, Bot Defense
Traffic ManagementLayer 7 Routing, GTM IntegrationGSLB, Automated Traffic Steering
AnalyticsReal-Time MetricsAI-Driven Predictive Analytics
DevOps IntegrationiControl REST APIFull CI/CD Pipeline Support
CompliancePCI-DSS, HIPAAFedRAMP, GDPR

Key differentiator: The VPR-C2400-AC’s container-native support accelerates microservices deployments.


3. Design & Form Factor

  • i5800: 1 RU rack-mount, 2 expansion slots, passive cooling.

  • VPR-C2400-AC: 100% software-defined, deployable on x86 servers or public clouds.

Why choose VPR? Zero hardware constraints for hybrid environments (on-premises + AWS/Azure).


4. User Experience

  • i5800: GUI-driven with limited automation; ideal for static environments.

  • VPR-C2400-AC: Deep CLI scripting, Ansible/Terraform integration, and F5 Automation Toolchain for CI/CD.

Real-world win: Enterprises adopt the VPR-C2400-AC for its zero-downtime upgrades via blue-green deployments.


5. Pricing Structure

  • i5800: ~30k-50k (CAPEX-heavy upfront).

  • VPR-C2400-AC: 15k-30k/year (OPEX model with licensing flexibility).

ROI insight: The VPR-C2400-AC pays for itself in 18-24 months through scalability and reduced hardware maintenance.


**6. Battery Consumption? Not Exactly…**

Neither model uses batteries, but the VPR-C2400-AC’s hypervisor-native efficiency slashes data center power costs by 40% vs. physical appliances.


7. Compatibility Showdown

Compatibilityi5800VPR-LTM C2400-AC
Cloud PlatformsAWS, AzureAWS, Azure, GCP, VMware Cloud
VirtualizationVMware, Hyper-VVMware, Hyper-V, KVM, Bare Metal
Security PartnersPalo Alto, Check PointPalo Alto, Check Point, Zscaler

Edge case: The VPR-C2400-AC natively integrates with Kubernetes Ingress Controllers for containerized apps.


8. Software Muscle

Both run TMOS, F5’s legendary OS, but the VPR-C2400-AC adds:

  • iApps LX Templates for rapid app deployment.

  • NGINX App Protect for web application firewalling.

  • SD-WAN Overlay for hybrid architectures.


Final Verdict

  • Buy the i5800 if: You prioritize simplicity for branch offices or small data centers with stable workloads.

  • Choose the VPR-C2400-AC if: You’re future-proofing for cloud-native apps, multi-cloud sprawl, or dynamic scaling needs.

One last question: Does your environment demand adaptive security and frictionless scalability? If yes, the VPR-C2400-AC’s pay-as-you-grow model delivers unmatched agility.



Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top