When selecting between F5 Networks' application delivery controllers, the BIG-IP i5600 (high-performance model) and BIG-IP i4600 (mid-range solution) offer distinct capabilities for different network environments. This comprehensive comparison examines their technical specifications, operational performance, and ideal deployment scenarios to help network architects make informed decisions.
Feature | F5 BIG-IP i5600 | F5 BIG-IP i4600 |
---|---|---|
Processor | 12-core 3.0 GHz | 8-core 2.4 GHz |
System Memory | 64 GB DDR4 | 32 GB DDR4 |
Storage | 960 GB SSD | 480 GB SSD |
Throughput Capacity | 40 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
SSL/TLS Performance | 20 Gbps | 10 Gbps |
Maximum Connections | 2 million | 1 million |
Power Consumption | 320W (typical) | 220W (typical) |
Network Interfaces | 16x 10/25G | 8x 1/10G |
The i5600 delivers 2x greater performance across key metrics compared to the i4600, establishing clear differentiation between these models.
Both models provide:
Layer 4-7 load balancing
SSL/TLS acceleration
Application health monitoring
Web application firewall
DNS load balancing
i5600 Advantages:
Higher connection capacity
Better SSL inspection throughput
Advanced traffic management
Enhanced DDoS protection
i4600 Strengths:
More power-efficient
Compact 1RU form factor
Lower acquisition cost
i5600 excels in:
High-volume traffic inspection
Advanced rate shaping
Detailed performance analytics
i4600 optimized for:
Standard security policies
Moderate traffic loads
Basic WAF configurations
Chassis Architecture:
i5600:
2RU enterprise design
Redundant power options
High-density port configuration
Data center optimized
i4600:
1RU compact form factor
Single power supply
Space-efficient design
Environmental Specifications:
Operating temperature:
Both: 0°C to 40°C
Physical dimensions:
i5600: 2RU, 24" deep
i4600: 1RU, 17.5" deep
Weight:
i5600: 30 lbs
i4600: 20 lbs
Administration & Management:
Both utilize:
F5 TMOS operating system
Web-based GUI
tmsh CLI
REST API support
Operational Differences:
i5600 better for:
Complex traffic policies
High-availability setups
Multi-site deployments
i4600 ideal for:
Simpler configurations
Single-site deployments
Lower administrative overhead
Acquisition Costs:
i5600: 60,000−75,000
i4600: 35,000−45,000
Operational Expenditures:
Power consumption difference: ~$100/year
Rack space requirements:
i5600 needs 2x more space
Support contracts:
Similar licensing models
Five-Year TCO Considerations:
i5600 justified for:
High-traffic applications
Enterprise deployments
Future growth
i4600 economical for:
Medium business needs
Branch office deployments
Budget-conscious projects
Energy Usage:
i5600: 320W (peak)
i4600: 220W (peak)
Efficiency Comparison:
Performance per watt:
i5600: 125 Mbps/W
i4600: 90 Mbps/W
Idle power draw:
i5600: 180W
i4600: 120W
Third-Party Integration:
Both support:
VMware, KVM, Hyper-V
Cloud platforms
Automation tools
i5600 Advantages:
More high-speed ports
Better scalability
Advanced SDN support
Current Versions:
Both run TMOS 16.x+
Support iRules customization
Future Development:
i5600 prioritized for:
Cloud ADC features
Enhanced analytics
i4600 receives:
Core updates
Security patches
Choose i5600 When:
✔ Handling 2M+ connections
✔ Need 40G+ throughput
✔ Running critical applications
✔ Planning future growth
Select i4600 When:
✔ Managing medium traffic
✔ Require cost efficiency
✔ Deploying in space-limited areas
✔ Running standard workloads
Implementation Strategy:
For organizations with mixed requirements, consider deploying i5600 at core locations and i4600 units at branch offices to balance performance and cost-effectiveness.
Key Differentiators:
Performance: i5600 handles 2x more traffic
Scalability: Better growth potential
Features: More advanced capabilities
Cost: i4600 provides better value for mid-range needs
Both deliver F5's proven ADC technology, with the i5600 offering superior performance for enterprise-scale deployments and the i4600 providing excellent value for mid-range requirements.