Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900
-31%
Cisco MDS 9200 Series Switch DS-C9250I-K9
$1600 $1100

F5 VPR-LTM-B4340N vs BIG-IP i4600: Virtual vs Hardware ADC Performance Comparison
Jun 25 , 2025 9

F5 VPR-LTM-B4340N vs BIG-IP i4600: Virtual vs Hardware ADC Performance Comparison


F5-VPR-LTM-B4340N vs F5-BIG-BT-I4600


When evaluating application delivery solutions from F5 Networks, the VPR-LTM-B4340N (virtual appliance) and BIG-IP i4600 (hardware appliance) represent fundamentally different deployment approaches. This comprehensive analysis examines their technical specifications, operational differences, and ideal use cases to help infrastructure teams make informed purchasing decisions.

Technical Specifications Comparison

FeatureF5 VPR-LTM-B4340NF5 BIG-IP i4600
Form FactorVirtual ApplianceHardware 1RU
vCPU Allocation8 vCPUs8-core 2.4 GHz
Memory Allocation32 GB vRAM32 GB DDR4
Storage500 GB vDisk480 GB SSD
Throughput Capacity12 Gbps20 Gbps
SSL/TLS Performance6 Gbps10 Gbps
Maximum Connections600,0001 million
Power ConsumptionHost-dependent220W (typical)
Network InterfacesVirtual NICs8x 1/10G SFP+

The BIG-IP i4600 demonstrates 40-60% better performance in throughput and connection handling compared to the virtual appliance.

Functional Capabilities Analysis

1. Core ADC Features

Both solutions provide:

  • Layer 4-7 load balancing

  • SSL/TLS termination

  • Application health monitoring

  • Basic web application firewall

  • DNS load balancing

BIG-IP i4600 Advantages:

  • Hardware-accelerated SSL

  • Higher connection capacity

  • Advanced traffic management

  • Better DDoS mitigation

VPR-LTM-B4340N Strengths:

  • Rapid deployment

  • Cloud migration flexibility

  • Resource scaling options

  • Lower upfront cost

2. Security & Traffic Management

  • BIG-IP i4600 excels in:

    • High-volume traffic inspection

    • Advanced rate shaping

    • Detailed performance analytics

  • VPR-LTM-B4340N optimized for:

    • Virtualized security policies

    • Cloud-native deployments

    • DevOps integration

Deployment & Design Comparison

Architecture Differences:

  • BIG-IP i4600:

    • Dedicated hardware appliance

    • 1RU rack-mountable

    • Front-accessible ports

    • Physical security features

  • VPR-LTM-B4340N:

    • Virtual machine deployment

    • Runs on VMware, KVM, Hyper-V

    • Cloud platform compatible

    • Software-defined networking

Environmental Impact:

  • Physical footprint:

    • i4600: 1RU rack space

    • VPR: No physical space required

  • Power considerations:

    • i4600: 220W typical

    • VPR: Host server power only

User Experience Evaluation

Administration & Management:
Both utilize:

  • F5 TMOS operating system

  • Web-based GUI

  • tmsh CLI

  • REST API support

Operational Differences:

  • BIG-IP i4600 better for:

    • High-performance environments

    • Complex traffic policies

    • Hardware-level optimization

  • VPR-LTM-B4340N ideal for:

    • Cloud migrations

    • DevOps workflows

    • Temporary deployments

Pricing & Cost Analysis

Acquisition Costs:

  • VPR-LTM-B4340N: 18,00025,000 (license)

  • BIG-IP i4600: 35,00045,000 (hardware)

Operational Expenditures:

  • Power consumption:

    • i4600: ~$200/year

    • VPR: Host server cost only

  • Support contracts:

    • Similar licensing models

Five-Year TCO Considerations:

  • BIG-IP i4600 justified for:

    • Performance-critical apps

    • High-availability setups

    • Security-sensitive deployments

  • VPR-LTM-B4340N economical for:

    • Cloud environments

    • Development/testing

    • Temporary workloads

Performance Efficiency

Resource Utilization:

  • BIG-IP i4600:

    • Dedicated hardware resources

    • Consistent performance

  • VPR-LTM-B4340N:

    • Shared host resources

    • Variable performance

Throughput Comparison:

  • SSL inspection:

    • i4600: 40% faster

  • Connection handling:

    • i4600: 40% greater capacity

Compatibility & Ecosystem

Integration Options:
Both support:

  • VMware integration

  • Cloud platforms

  • Automation tools

BIG-IP i4600 Advantages:

  • Physical network integration

  • Hardware security modules

  • Advanced SDN support

VPR-LTM-B4340N Strengths:

  • Cloud-native deployments

  • Container orchestration

  • DevOps toolchains

Software Support & Roadmap

Current Versions:

  • Both run TMOS 16.x+

  • Support iRules customization

Future Development:

  • BIG-IP i4600 prioritized for:

    • Hardware enhancements

    • Advanced analytics

  • VPR-LTM-B4340N focused on:

    • Cloud feature parity

    • Container support

Final Recommendation

Choose BIG-IP i4600 When:
✔ Maximum performance required
✔ Hardware-level security needed
✔ Running mission-critical apps
✔ Physical network integration

Select VPR-LTM-B4340N When:
✔ Cloud migration underway
✔ Need deployment flexibility
✔ Running temporary workloads
✔ DevOps integration required

Key Selection Criteria:

  1. Performance requirements

  2. Deployment environment

  3. Security needs

  4. Budget constraints

The BIG-IP i4600 remains the choice for high-performance, security-sensitive deployments, while the VPR-LTM-B4340N provides essential ADC capabilities in virtualized and cloud environments. Many enterprises deploy both solutions to cover different use cases across their infrastructure.


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top