Welcome to www.linknewnet.com.

New Promotion

-8%
Cisco N3K-C3172PQ-Z8
$750 $690
-40%
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch N9K-C9332D-GX2B
$38000 $22800
-38%
Cisco Switch Catalyst 9500 Series C9500-40X-A
$4000 $2500
-49%
Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switch C9300-24T-A
$1750 $900
-31%
Cisco MDS 9200 Series Switch DS-C9250I-K9
$1600 $1100

F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S vs Cisco FPR-4120-K9: High-Performance ADC vs Enterprise Firewall Comparison
Jun 24 , 2025 3

F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S vs Cisco FPR-4120-K9: High-Performance ADC vs Enterprise Firewall Comparison


F5-BIG-LTM-4000S vs FPR-4120-K9


When evaluating network infrastructure components, the F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S (application delivery controller) and Cisco FPR-4120-K9 (next-generation firewall) serve distinct purposes in enterprise network architectures. This comprehensive comparison examines their technical specifications, operational capabilities, and ideal deployment scenarios to help network architects make informed purchasing decisions.

Technical Specifications Comparison

FeatureF5 BIG-IP LTM 4000SCisco FPR-4120-K9
Processor16-core 3.0 GHz16-core 3.2 GHz
System Memory64 GB DDR464 GB DDR4
Storage960 GB SSD960 GB SSD
Throughput Capacity40 Gbps25 Gbps
SSL/TLS Performance20 Gbps15 Gbps
Maximum Connections2 million1.2 million
Power Consumption300W (typical)280W (typical)
Network Interfaces16x 10/25G SFP2816x 1/10/25G SFP28

The BIG-IP LTM 4000S demonstrates superior application delivery performance, while the FPR-4120-K9 excels in comprehensive security enforcement capabilities.

Functional Capabilities Analysis

1. Core Functionality

  • F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S:

    • Advanced Layer 4-7 load balancing

    • SSL/TLS acceleration

    • Web application firewall

    • DNS load balancing

    • Protocol optimization

  • FPR-4120-K9:

    • Stateful firewall inspection

    • Intrusion prevention system

    • Advanced malware protection

    • Application visibility and control

    • URL filtering and categorization

2. Security Features

Shared Capabilities:

  • SSL/TLS inspection

  • Basic firewall functionality

  • IP reputation filtering

BIG-IP LTM 4000S Advantages:

  • Advanced application persistence

  • Intelligent traffic management

  • iRules customization

  • Protocol optimization

FPR-4120-K9 Strengths:

  • Deep packet inspection

  • Integrated threat intelligence

  • Advanced malware analysis

  • Sandboxing capabilities

Physical Design Comparison

Chassis Architecture:

  • F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S:

    • 2RU data center optimized

    • Hot-swappable power supplies

    • Front-accessible ports

    • High-density connectivity

  • FPR-4120-K9:

    • 2RU enterprise chassis

    • Redundant power options

    • Front/rear service access

    • Security-optimized design

Environmental Specifications:

  • Operating temperature:

    • Both: 0 to 40°C

  • Physical dimensions:

    • BIG-IP 4000S: 2RU, 24" deep

    • FPR-4120: 2RU, 17.5" deep

  • Weight:

    • BIG-IP 4000S: 35 lbs

    • FPR-4120: 28 lbs

User Experience Evaluation

Administration & Management:

  • F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S:

    • F5 Configuration utility

    • TMOS Shell (tmsh)

    • iControl REST API

    • Centralized management

  • FPR-4120-K9:

    • Firepower Management Center

    • Cisco Defense Orchestrator

    • REST API/SDK access

    • Multi-device management

Operational Differences:

  • BIG-IP 4000S excels in:

    • Application traffic management

    • SSL optimization

    • Advanced load balancing

  • FPR-4120-K9 superior for:

    • Threat detection/prevention

    • Security policy enforcement

    • Network segmentation

Pricing & Total Cost Analysis

Acquisition Costs:

  • F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S: 75,00090,000

  • FPR-4120-K9: 45,00055,000

Operational Expenditures:

  • Power consumption difference: ~$50/year

  • Rack space requirements:

    • Similar 2RU footprint

  • Support contracts:

    • Both require premium licensing

Five-Year TCO Considerations:

  • BIG-IP 4000S justified for:

    • High-performance application delivery

    • SSL-intensive environments

    • Large-scale deployments

  • FPR-4120-K9 economical for:

    • Comprehensive security

    • Enterprise threat prevention

    • Security-focused budgets

Power Efficiency Metrics

Power Specifications:

  • Input options:

    • Both support AC power

    • Both offer redundant options

  • Energy monitoring:

    • Both provide real-time metrics

Efficiency Comparison:

  • Performance per watt:

    • BIG-IP 4000S: 133 Mbps/W

    • FPR-4120: 89 Mbps/W

  • Idle power draw:

    • BIG-IP 4000S: 200W

    • FPR-4120: 150W

Compatibility & Ecosystem Integration

Third-Party Interoperability:

  • Both support:

    • SIEM integration

    • Cloud platforms

    • API-based automation

BIG-IP 4000S Enhanced Integration:

  • Kubernetes ingress controller

  • OpenStack integration

  • DevOps toolchains

  • iApps templates

FPR-4120-K9 Advantages:

  • Cisco SecureX platform

  • Advanced threat intelligence

  • SD-WAN security integration

Software Support & Lifecycle

Current Software Features:

  • F5 BIG-IP 4000S:

    • TMOS 16.1+

    • Advanced traffic management

    • SSL insights

    • Cloud-native ADC

  • FPR-4120-K9:

    • Firepower 7.0+

    • Threat intelligence

    • Behavioral analytics

    • Cloud security

Security Updates:

  • Both receive:

    • Regular vulnerability patches

    • 5+ years of maintenance

  • FPR-4120-K9 offers:

    • Extended threat intelligence

    • Critical security updates

Future Roadmap:

  • BIG-IP 4000S:

    • Enhanced cloud integration

    • Container support

    • Advanced analytics

  • FPR-4120-K9:

    • AI-driven security

    • Cloud-scale protection

    • Advanced threat prevention

Decision Framework

Select F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S When:
✔ High-performance application delivery
✔ SSL/TLS intensive environments
✔ Large-scale deployments
✔ Advanced traffic management

Choose FPR-4120-K9 When:
✔ Comprehensive security required
✔ Enterprise threat prevention
✔ Network segmentation
✔ Cisco ecosystem integration

Key Selection Criteria:

  1. Primary workload (application delivery vs security)

  2. Performance requirements

  3. Existing infrastructure

  4. Budget constraints

The F5 BIG-IP LTM 4000S excels in high-performance application delivery, while the FPR-4120-K9 provides superior security enforcement capabilities. These solutions are complementary rather than competitive in most enterprise environments.

Implementation Recommendation: For organizations requiring both high-performance application delivery and security, consider deploying the BIG-IP 4000S for application optimization behind the FPR-4120-K9 security appliance. This layered approach delivers both application performance and robust security protection.


Related Blogs

WhatsApp
Quote
Contact
Top