1. Product Overview
N9K-C93108TC-EX
- Ports: 48x 10G SFP+ + 6x 40G QSFP+ (breakout to 16x 10G)
- Switching Capacity: 1.2Tbps
- Forwarding Rate: 900Mpps
- ASIC: Cisco Cloud Scale (Gen 1)
- Buffer: 9MB dynamic shared
- Latency: ~1μs (10G ports)
- Key Features: VXLAN, EVPN, FCoE support
- Best For: SMB data center access, virtualization, legacy storage
N9K-C93180YC-EX
- Ports: 48x 25G SFP28 + 6x 100G QSFP28 (breakout to 4x25G or 4x10G)
- Switching Capacity: 3.6Tbps
- Forwarding Rate: 1.2Bpps
- ASIC: Enhanced Cisco Cloud Scale
- Buffer: 12MB dynamic shared
- Latency: ~800ns (25G ports)
- Key Features: VXLAN, EVPN, NVMe-oF optimized
- Best For: Cloud data centers, AI/ML clusters, high-performance storage
2. Key Differences at a Glance
Feature | N9K-C93108TC-EX | N9K-C93180YC-EX |
Port Speeds | 10G/40G era | 25G/100G future-ready |
Performance | 1.2Tbps / 900Mpps | 3.6Tbps / 1.2Bpps |
Buffer Size | 9MB | 12MB |
Tech Lifespan | Legacy-friendly | NVMe/400G upgrade path |
Power Draw | 250W | 350W |
3. Head-to-Head Use Case Comparison
Virtualization & Private Cloud
- 93108TC-EX: Adequate for VMware/Nutanix with 10G vMotion.
- 93180YC-EX: 25G eliminates bottlenecks in hyperconverged (vSAN/OpenStack).
Storage Networks
- 93108TC-EX: Reliable for iSCSI/NAS (but struggles with all-flash arrays).
- 93180YC-EX: Cuts NVMe-oF latency by 30% vs. 10G alternatives.
AI/ML Workloads
- 93108TC-EX: Limited to small RDMA clusters (<50 nodes).
- 93180YC-EX: Handles 200+ GPU nodes with consistent microburst absorption.
Edge Networking
- 93108TC-EX: Cost-effective for enterprise WAN aggregation.
- 93180YC-EX: SRv6 support makes it ideal for 5G MEC deployments.
4. Decision Checklist
Choose N9K-C93108TC-EX When You Need:
✓ Budget-conscious 10G migration
✓ Legacy FC/FCoE storage compatibility
✓ Basic virtualization without RDMA
Choose N9K-C93180YC-EX When You Need:
✓ 25G/100G readiness for cloud-native apps
✓ NVMe-oF or AI/ML performance guarantees
✓ "Buy once, scale for 5+ years" strategy
5. Real-World Scenarios
Case 1: Healthcare Provider
- Choice: 93108TC-EX
- Why: PACS imaging workflows performed equally on 10G vs. 25G at 40% lower switch cost.
Case 2: Autonomous Vehicle Startup
- Choice: 93180YC-EX
- Why: 25G RDMA reduced sensor data processing latency by 22% during peak loads.
6. The Bottom Line
While the 93108TC-EX saves CapEx for traditional networks, the 93180YC-EX delivers greater ROI for:
✔ AI/ML infrastructure
✔ Cloud-native transformation
✔ Storage modernization
Final Question: Will your network outgrow 10G within 3 years? If yes, the 25G/100G model pays for itself.